Abstract:Derivatives of differential equation solutions are commonly for parameter estimation, fitting neural differential equations, and as model diagnostics. However, with a litany of choices and a Cartesian product of potential methods, it can be difficult for practitioners to understand which method is likely to be the most effective on their particular application. In this manuscript we investigate the performance characteristics of Discrete Local Sensitivity Analysis implemented via Automatic Differentiation (DSAAD) against continuous adjoint sensitivity analysis. Non-stiff and stiff biological and pharmacometric models, including a PDE discretization, are used to quantify the performance of sensitivity analysis methods. Our benchmarks show that on small stiff and non-stiff systems of ODEs (approximately < 100 parameters+ODEs), forward-mode DSAAD is more efficient than both reverse-mode and continuous forward/adjoint sensitivity analysis. The scalability of continuous adjoint methods is shown to be more efficient than discrete adjoints and forward methods after crossing this size range. These comparative studies demonstrate a trade-off between memory usage and performance in the continuous adjoint methods that should be considered when choosing the technique, while numerically unstable backsolve techniques from the machine learning literature are demonstrated as unsuitable for most scientific models. The performance of adjoint methods is shown to be heavily tied to the reverse-mode AD method used for the vector-Jacobian product calculations, with tape-based AD methods shown to be 2 orders of magnitude slower on nonlinear partial differential equations than static AD techniques. In addition, these results demonstrate the out-of-the-box applicability of DSAAD to differential-algebraic equations, delay differential equations, and hybrid differential equation systems where the event timing and effects are dependent on model parameters, showcasing an ease of implementation advantage for DSAAD approaches. Together, these benchmarks provide a guide to help practitioners to quickly identify the best mixture of continuous sensitivities and automatic differentiation for their applications.

Analytical Sensitivity Analysis of Dynamic Problems with Direct Differentiation of Generalized-α Time Integration

Differential-algebraic Approach to Coupled Problems of Dynamic Thermoelasticity

A Novel Analytical Second‐order Sensitivity Calculation Approach Using the Finite Element Method for Chemical Engineering Problems

Application of Automatic Differentiation in Power System Trajectory Sensitivity Analysis

A Time Integration Algorithm for Structural Dynamics With Improved Numerical Dissipation: The Generalized-α Method

Transient Response Sensitivity Analysis of Localized Nonlinear Structure Using Direct Differentiation Method

State-space based discretize-then-differentiate adjoint sensitivity method for transient responses of non-viscously damped systems

Sensitivity analysis of differential-algebraic equations and partial differential equations

A Comparison of Automatic Differentiation and Continuous Sensitivity Analysis for Derivatives of Differential Equation Solutions

Design sensitivity analysis of dynamic response of nonviscously damped systems

APPLYING AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION TO SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN DISTILLATION COLUMN OPTIMIZATION

A comparative study of design sensitivity analysis based on adjoint variable method for transient response of non-viscously damped systems

A discrete adjoint gradient approach for equality and inequality constraints in dynamics

Sensitivity analysis of systems of differential and algebraic equations

Sensitivity analysis for differential algebraic equations

Exploration of methods for computing sensitivities in ODE models at dynamic and steady states

Sensitivity-analysis methods for nonsmooth multibody systems with contact and friction

Benchmarking methods for computing local sensitivities in ordinary differential equation models at dynamic and steady states

An identical second‐order single step explicit integration algorithm with dissipation control for structural dynamics

Efficiency analysis of numerical integrations for finite element substructure in real-time hybrid simulation

Sensitivity Analysis for Transient Thermal Problems Using the Complex-Variable Finite Element Method