Background model for the Low-Energy Telescope of Insight-HXMT

Jin-Yuan Liao,Shu Zhang,Yong Chen,Juan Zhang,Jing Jin,Zhi Chang,Yu-Peng Chen,Ming-Yu Ge,Cheng-Cheng Guo,Gang Li,Xiao-Bo Li,Fang-Jun Lu,Xue-Feng Lu,Jian-Yin Nie,Li-Ming Song,Yan-Ji Yang,Yuan You,Hai-Sheng Zhao,Shuang-Nan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2020.02.010
IF: 4.925
2020-08-01
Journal of High Energy Astrophysics
Abstract:<p>With more than 150 blank sky observations at high Galactic latitude, we make a systematic study to the background of the Low Energy Telescope (LE) of the <em>Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope</em> (dubbed as <em>Insight-HXMT</em>). Both the on-ground simulation and the in-orbit observation indicate that the background spectrum mainly has two components. One is the particle background that dominates above 7 keV and its spectral shape is consistent in every geographical locations. Another is the diffuse X-ray background that dominates below 7 keV and has a stable spectrum less dependent of the sky region. The particle background spectral shape can be obtained from the blind detector data of all the blank sky observations, and the particle background intensity can be measured by the blind detector at <span class="math"><math>10−12.5</math></span> keV. The diffuse X-ray background in the high Galactic latitude can also be obtained from the blank sky spectra after subtracting the particle background. Based on these characteristics, we develop the background model for both the spectrum and the light curve. The systematic error for the background spectrum is investigated with different exposures (<span class="math"><math>Texp</math></span>). For the spectrum with <span class="math"><math>Texp=1</math></span> ks, the average systematic errors in <span class="math"><math>1−7</math></span> keV and <span class="math"><math>1−10</math></span> keV are 4.2% and 3.7%, respectively. We also perform the systematic error analyses of the background light curves with different energy bands and time bins. The results show that the systematic errors for the light curves with different time bins are <span class="math"><math>&lt;8%</math></span> in <span class="math"><math>1−10</math></span> keV.</p>
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?