Factors associated with psychological distress following colposcopy among women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology: a prospective study within the Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-grade Abnormal smears (TOMBOLA)
Linda Sharp,Seonaidh Cotton,Anne-Elie Carsin,Nicola Gray,Alison Thornton,Margaret Cruickshank,Julian Little,TOMBOLA Group,Maggie Cruickshank,Graeme Murray,David Parkin,Louise Smart,Eric Walker,Norman Waugh,Mark Avis,Claire Chilvers,Katherine Fielding,Rob Hammond,David Jenkins,Jane Johnson,Keith Neal,Rashmi Seth,Dave Whynes,Ian Duncan,Alistair Robertson,Ian Russell,Leslie Walker,Breda Anthony,Sarah Bell,Adrienne Bowie,Katrina Brown,Joe Brown,Kheng Chew,Claire Cochran,Jeannie Dean,Kate Dunn,Jane Edwards,David Evans,Julie Fenty,Al Finlayson,Marie Gallagher,Maureen Heddle,Alison Innes,Debbie Jobson,Mandy Keillor,Jayne MacGregor,Sheona Mackenzie,Amanda Mackie,Gladys McPherson,Ike Okorocha,Morag Reilly,Joan Rodgers,Rachel Yeats,Lindyanne Alexander,Lindsey Buchanan,Susan Henderson,Tine Iterbeke,Susanneke Lucas,Gillian Manderson,Sheila Nicol,Gael Reid,Carol Robinson,Trish Sandilands,Marg Adrian,Ahmed Al-Sahab,Elaine Bentley,Hazel Brook,Claire Bushby,Rita Cannon,Brenda Cooper,Ruth Dowell,Mark Dunderdale,Gabrawi,Li Guo,Lisa Heideman,Steve Jones,Salli Lawson,Zoë Philips,Christopher Platt,Shakuntala Prabhakaran,John Rippin,Rose Thompson,Elizabeth Williams,Claire Woolley,Kirsten Harrild,John Norrie,Nicholas Day,Theresa Marteau,Mahesh Parmar,Julietta Patnick,Ciaran Woodman,Doug Altman,Sue Moss,Michael Wells
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2097
Abstract:Background: Little is known about psychological after-effects of colposcopy and associated investigations and treatment in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology. We investigated psychological distress following colposcopy and related procedures. Methods: Nine hundred and eighty-nine women aged 20-59 years with routine cytology showing low-grade abnormalities were recruited to the Trial of Management of Borderline and other Low-grade Abnormal smears and attended colposcopy. If the cervical transformation zone (TZ) was colposcopically abnormal, women had immediate loop excision or diagnostic punch biopsies, with treatment if these showed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 (CIN2/3). Women completed socio-demographic and psychosocial questionnaires at recruitment and before colposcopy. Six weeks after their last procedure, women completed the Impact of Event Scale (IES). Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with significant psychological distress (IES ≥ 9). Analyses were stratified by colposcopic impression. Results: The response rate was 74%. Six weeks after the last procedure, 86 (21%) of 391 women with a normal TZ had significant distress compared with 144 (42%) of 337 with an abnormal TZ. In both groups, significant distress was associated with anxiety pre-colposcopy and pain or discharge afterwards. Additional variables predicting distress in women with a normal TZ were worries about having sex and dissatisfaction with support from others. In women with an abnormal TZ, additional predictors of distress were younger age, CIN2/3, bleeding following colposcopy and worries about having cancer. Conclusions: Substantial proportions of women experience psychological distress after colposcopy and related procedures, even when the colposcopy is normal. This is an important cost of cervical screening. Interventions to alleviate these adverse psychological effects are required.