A combined nutritional risk index and carcinoembryonic antigen score predicts the outcome in radically resected colorectal cancer

Guanzhou Chen,Jiang Xie,Panhua Li,Qin Wang,Qianwen Ye,Shouhan Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.19161
IF: 1.7
2024-07-19
ANZ Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Nutritional risk index (NRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), which stands for the 'yin and yang' factors that can individually impact the survival in colorectal cancer (CRC), are used to construct the NRI and CEA score (NCS). This study found that NCS can be used to distinguish the survival in stages I–III CRC patients effectively. And NCS 1 patients displayed the longest survival; NCS 3 patients presented the shortest survival. In addition, NCS 2 patients' survival was in the middle of these two subgroups. At last, the effeteness of NCS in distinguish survival was maintained even in cases with a maximum tumor diameter ≤4 cm. Background Nutritional risk index (NRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the prognostic value of a combination of the NRI and CEA, namely, the NRI and CEA score (NCS), needs further investigation. Methods Stage I‐III CRC patients were collected and then divided into three subgroups by counting the NCS: NCS 1: high NRI with normal CEA; NCS 2: high NRI with elevated CEA or low NRI with normal CEA; and NCS 3: low NRI with elevated CEA. The differences in outcome, counted as disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were tested among the subgroups. Results A total of 285 patients were enrolled, with 108 in NCS 1, 118 in NCS 2 and 59 in NCS 3. Patient features, including age, tumour deposit, T stage, N stage and TNM stage, were significantly different in the NCS subgroups. Both the DFS (log‐rank = 26.06, P<0.001) and OS (log‐rank = 39.10, P<0.001) were significant in different NCS subgroups, even in maximum tumour diameter ≤4 cm cases (DFS: log‐rank = 21.42, P<0.001; OS: log‐rank = 30.95, P<0.001), and NCS 1 patients displayed the best outcome compared with the rest of the subgroups. NCS was also found to be an independent risk factor for both DFS and OS. Conclusions NCS was a useful prognostic indicator in stages I–III CRC patients.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?