Abstract:Until recently, social media was seen to promote democratic discourse on social and political issues. However, this powerful communication platform has come under scrutiny for allowing hostile actors to exploit online discussions in an attempt to manipulate public opinion. A case in point is the ongoing U.S. Congress' investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election campaign, with Russia accused of using trolls (malicious accounts created to manipulate) and bots to spread misinformation and politically biased information. In this study, we explore the effects of this manipulation campaign, taking a closer look at users who re-shared the posts produced on Twitter by the Russian troll accounts publicly disclosed by U.S. Congress investigation. We collected a dataset with over 43 million election-related posts shared on Twitter between September 16 and October 21, 2016, by about 5.7 million distinct users. This dataset included accounts associated with the identified Russian trolls. We use label propagation to infer the ideology of all users based on the news sources they shared. This method enables us to classify a large number of users as liberal or conservative with precision and recall above 90%. Conservatives retweeted Russian trolls about 31 times more often than liberals and produced 36x more tweets. Additionally, most retweets of troll content originated from two Southern states: Tennessee and Texas. Using state-of-the-art bot detection techniques, we estimated that about 4.9% and 6.2% of liberal and conservative users respectively were bots. Text analysis on the content shared by trolls reveals that they had a mostly conservative, pro-Trump agenda. Although an ideologically broad swath of Twitter users was exposed to Russian Trolls in the period leading up to the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, it was mainly conservatives who helped amplify their message.

Suspended accounts align with the Internet Research Agency misinformation campaign to influence the 2016 US election

Suspended accounts align with the Internet Research Agency misinformation campaign to influence the 2016 US election

Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three U.S. Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017

Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA Influence Campaign

Predicting Engagement with the Internet Research Agency's Facebook and Instagram Campaigns around the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Leaders or Followers? A Temporal Analysis of Tweets from IRA Trolls

Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

Investigating Coordinated 'Social' Targeting of High-Profile Twitter Accounts

Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?

On the Influence of Twitter Trolls during the 2016 US Presidential Election

Who Let The Trolls Out? Towards Understanding State-Sponsored Trolls

Facebook Ad Engagement in the Russian Active Measures Campaign of 2016

Multifaceted online coordinated behavior in the 2020 US presidential election

The effects of Facebook and Instagram on the 2020 election: A deactivation experiment

Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions

Exploiting the Right: Inferring Ideological Alignment in Online Influence Campaigns Using Shared Images

Swinging in the States: Does disinformation on Twitter mirror the US presidential election system?

Unraveling the Web of Disinformation: Exploring the Larger Context of State-Sponsored Influence Campaigns on Twitter

Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Election

Bots are less central than verified accounts during contentious political events