Abstract:Auditory and motor systems interact in processing auditory rhythms. This study investigated the effect of intuitive body movement, such as head nodding or foot tapping, on listeners’ ability to entrain to the pulse of an auditory sequence. A pulse-finding task was employed using an isochronous sequence of tones in which tones were omitted at pseudorandom positions. Musicians and non-musicians identified their subjectively fitting pulse either using periodic body movement or through listening only. The identified pulse was measured subsequently by finger tapping. Movement appeared to assist pulse extraction especially for non-musicians. The chosen pulse tempi tended to be faster with movement. Additionally, movement led to higher synchronization stabilities of the produced pulse along the sequence, regardless of musical training. These findings demonstrated the facilitatory role of body movement in entraining to auditory rhythms and its interaction with musical training. Introduction Imagine sitting in a live jazz concert: the listeners feel immersed in the music and start intuitively to move along with different parts of their body. The same is seen in the musicians: they automatically move their head or tap their feet in a periodic manner while playing some rhythmically engaging passages. Even in a classical concert where excessive gestures are not encouraged by convention, we often observe musicians rhythmically moving some parts of their body that are not engaged in playing the instruments, along with the music. Moving one’s body periodically to the music, be it foot tapping or head nodding, is a frequent manifestation in listeners as well as in performing musicians. It presents a common example of audio–motor crosstalk in experiencing musical rhythms, and poses an interesting question about the nature of rhythm perception: do we move only because we react to the rhythm we hear, or does the movement itself contribute to the process of hearing the rhythm? Perception and action are believed to share common representational mechanisms through which they interact (Prinz, 1997). Neurophysiological studies on rhythm perception have also concurred that processing auditory rhythms engages both auditory and motor areas of the brain (Chen, Penhune, & Zatorre, 2008b; Grahn & Brett, 2007; Bengtsson et al., 2009), and the motor system can be crucial in this act (Grahn & Brett, 2009). A direct behavioral link between ‘hearing the rhythm’ and ‘moving the body’ has been established in two studies where the interpretation of the same auditory rhythm was shaped by different patterns in which the listeners bounced their body (PhillipsSilver & Trainor, 2005, 2007). Given this audio–motor interplay, the present study further pursued the hypothesis that the use of body movement is not merely a reaction to Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Y.-H. Su (&) Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestr. 31, 80336 Munich, Germany e-mail: jasmine.su@med.uni-muenchen.de E. Pöppel Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany 123 Psychological Research (2012) 76:373–382 DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0346-3

A Phase II Study of Combined Chemotherapy with 5-Week Cycles of S-1 and CPT-11 plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer

A brief and efficient stimulus set to create the inverted U-shaped relationship between rhythmic complexity and the sensation of groove.

The sweet spot between predictability and surprise: musical groove in brain, body, and social interactions

Validation of the 1 μg short synacthen test: an assessment of morning cortisol cut-off values and other predictors.

The sensation of groove engages motor and reward networks

An SEM approach to validating the psychological model of musical groove.

Oscillatory Attention in Groove

Predictive coding in musical anhedonia: A study of groove

Neural dynamics of predictive timing and motor engagement in music listening

PalmBeat: A Kinesthetic Way to Feel Groove With Music.

Oscillations create groove: A reservoir model for learning complex drumming performances

A Stimulus Set of 40 Popular Music Drum Patterns with Perceived Complexity Measures

Dance, Music, Meter and Groove: A Forgotten Partnership

Isolating the effect of beat salience on rhythmic auditory stimulation outcomes

Groove Rhythm Enhances Exercise Impact on Prefrontal Cortex Function in Groove Enjoyers

The influence of external and internal motor processes on human auditory rhythm perception

Does it Swing? Microtiming Deviations and Swing Feeling in Jazz

Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity in Denmark in a Ten-Year Period (1996–2005): Is the Incidence Increasing?

The Pleasurable Urge to Move to Music Through the Lens of Learning Progress

Rhythm contour drives musical memory

Cortical and behavioural tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise