Sweet T‐bursting is the subiculum's true badge

R. W. Turner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/JP274981

2017-10-01

Journal of Physiology

Abstract:Extensive work on the factors that control excitability in neurons steadily reveals that cell output can be governed by voltage-gated ion channels that are expressed on a cellor region-specific basis. In this issue of The Journal of Physiology, Joksimovic et al. (2017) identify a key contribution by T-type calcium channels to spike output of pyramidal cells in the subiculum, a region responsible for a large component of the output of hippocampus. Past work has shown that pyramidal cells in the subiculum exhibit different forms of spike output that range from regular spiking to weak or strong bursting (Jung et al. 2001). The properties of regular spiking or bursting pyramidal cell output are significant in the context of oscillatory activity in subiculum that ranges from slow wave to fast oscillations and ripples. The distribution of bursting pyramidal cells has also been shown to increase in the proximal–distal extent with respect to the neighbouring CA1 region. As such, the output of subicular neurons parallels a shift in postsynaptic targets as diverse as prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and hypothalamus (Kim & Spruston, 2012), revealing a regionally defined output to select postsynaptic targets. The need to understand the ionic factors that define subicular neuron output is further emphasized by the ability for burst discharge to be bidirectionally modulated by mGlu and cholinergic receptor activation (Moore et al. 2009). The afterdepolarizing potential (ADP) that drives burst discharge in subicular cells has been shown to be influenced by different factors that include voltage-gated calcium, sodium and potassium channels. The findings of Joksimovic et al. (2017) now place Cav3 calcium channels at the centre of understanding the factors that control subicular cell firing and thus hippocampal output. Joksimovic et al. (2017) use in vitro slice recordings from rats and mice to conduct a biophysical analysis of the expression pattern and role for Cav3 calcium channel isoforms in different firing patterns of pyramidal cells, as well as GABAergic interneurons. While voltage clamp recordings from intact neurons can be subject to space clamp issues, the authors carefully assessed calcium channel properties in younger animals with the advantage of relatively new selective T-type channel blockers and extensive past research into the physiology of low voltage-activated calcium channels. These tests revealed a high density of calcium channels activated with low voltage characteristics consistent with Cav3 calcium channels (Vh = −87 mV; Va = −52 mV). The contribution of T-type calcium currents to generating an ADP was revealed using the Cav3 channel blocker TTA-P2, without effects by the R-type channel blocker SNX-482. Joksimovic et al. further narrowed down the Cav3 channel isoforms expressed in rat subicular cells using qRT-PCR, which revealed a dominant expression of the Cav3.1 isoform compared to Cav3.2 or Cav3.3 channel isoforms. Careful assessment of the relative incidence of four different patterns of firing detected in wild-type vs. Cav3.1 or Cav3.2 knockout mice revealed a larger portion of regular spiking compared to bursting in neurons in Cav3.1 knockout animals. Finally, the authors tested the role of Cav3 channels in mediating LTP of synaptic transmission by comparing the results of activating inputs in stratum oriens to subicular pyramidal cells to that of inputs in stratum radiatum to CA1 pyramidal cells. Here they found that TTA-P2 blocked LTP of the evoked EPSP in subicular cells but had no effect on LTP of stratum radiatum-evoked inputs to CA1. Additional strong support for Cav3.1 calcium contributions to subicular inputs was obtained in a lack of LTP in Cav3.1 knockout mice. This is significant in identifying yet another synapse where T-type channels have a role in mediating synaptic plasticity, and again emphasizes the difference between pyramidal cells in these neighbouring regions. Additional evidence for Cav3 channel contributions to bursting is the work by Moore et al. (2009) who established an LTP of postsynaptic burst discharge in subicular neurons. Here LTP induction was not governed by NMDA or AMPA receptor activation, but rather was modulated in a bimodal fashion through an enhanced burst discharge with coactivation of mGluR1 and M1 cholinergic receptors, and burst depression by mGluR5 receptors. To this end, Cav3.1 channels have been shown in cerebellar Purkinje cells to be augmented by mGluR activation (Hildebrand et al. 2009). The extent to which a bimodal modulation of burst discharge in subicular neurons is mediated through Cav3.1 channels remains to be determined, but would provide a key hinge-point for synaptic control of subicular neuronal output.