DOP01 Definitions of histological abnormalities in inflammatory bowel disease: an ECCO position paper

F Rosini,R M Feakins,P Borralho Nunes,A Driessen,I O Gordon,N Zidar,P Baldin,B Christensen,S Danese,N Herlihy,M Iacucci,M B Loughrey,F Magro,A Mookhoek,M Svrcek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0041

2024-01-01

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis

Abstract:Abstract Background High quality histological examination of ileocolonic biopsies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) plays a critical role in optimising clinical management, investigative studies, and clinical trials. The correct assessment of histological features can confirm the diagnosis of IBD, assist with its subclassification (as ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease), facilitate the estimation of disease activity and disease extent, and aid the detection of mimics and complication. However, there are surprisingly few universal definitions of each histological abnormalities and the existing definitions are often inconsistent. The main practical concern is that histological scoring schemes, or guidelines on histological diagnosis, include detailed features, and many of these features have, paradoxically, no, or vague definitions. Furthermore, interobserver variability for many histological features in IBD is significantly high, possibly reflecting lack of precision. The aim of this paper is to review and assess any existing histologcal definitions and criteria, selecting the most appropriate where possible, and modifying them or writing new definitions where necessary. Methods The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and the project leaders formed a panel of experts in the IBD field, composed of pathologists and gastroenterologists to explore inconsistencies in the definitions of histological abnormalities using the best resources and evidence available. The panel examined existing definitions, peer reviews publications, scoring schemes, guidelines and textbooks. An important contribution was also given by their professional experience and knowledge. Results The literature review process confirmed that most current existing definitions often have no evidence base and vary between sources. The panel of experts developed 40 statements on histological definitions in IBD with accompanying supporting text for each statement. Conclusion The statements represent expert consensus with the support of evidence where available. Further possible development of this process will include attempts to grade histological changes, aiming to improve the consistency of pathological diagnosis, a reduction in currently high rates of interobserver variability, more precision in clinical trial work and research, and to facilitate development of new guidelines and scoring schemes for IBD.

gastroenterology & hepatology