The use of wearable resistance and weighted vest for sprint performance and kinematics: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gabriel Felipe Arantes Bertochi,Márcio Fernando Tasinafo Júnior,Izabela A. Santos,Jeffer Eidi Sasaki,Gustavo R. Mota,Gabriela Gregorutti Jordão,Enrico Fuini Puggina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54282-8
IF: 4.6
2024-03-07
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Wearable resistance (WR) and weighted vests (WV) can be used in almost all training conditions to enhance sprint performance; however, positioning and additional mass are different in WV and WR strategies, affecting performance and kinematics differently. We aimed to systematically review the literature, searching for intervention studies that reported the acute or chronic kinematic and performance impact of WV and WR and comparing them. We analyzed Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and SPORTDiscuss databases for longitudinal and cross-over studies investigating sprint performance or kinematics using an inverse-variance with a random-effect method for meta-analysis. After the eligibility assessment, 25 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Cross-over WR and WV studies found significantly higher sprint times and higher ground contact times (CT) compared to unloaded (UL) conditions. However, WR presented a lower step frequency (SF) compared to UL, whereas WV presented a lower step length (SL). Only one study investigated the chronic adaptations for WR, indicating a superiority of the WR group on sprint time compared to the control group. However, no difference was found chronically for WV regarding sprint time, CT, and flight time (FT). Our findings suggest that using WV and WR in field sports demonstrates overload sprint gesture through kinematic changes, however, WR can be more suitable for SF-reliant athletes and WV for SL-reliant athletes. Although promising for chronic performance improvement, coaches and athletes should carefully consider WV and WR use since there is no supporting evidence that WV or WR will impact sprint performance, CT, and FT.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the effects of Wearable Resistance (WR) and Weighted Vest (WV) on sprint performance and kinematic characteristics. Sprinting ability is crucial in many competitive sports, where faster athletes often gain a decisive advantage in competitions. Traditional training methods such as plyometric training and gravity training have limited transfer effects on improving sprint performance and may be inconsistent and time-consuming. Therefore, researchers have begun to explore specific training strategies to enhance short-distance sprint performance. Wearable resistance and weighted vest strategies, which provide high-specificity overload training, are gaining increasing attention with the aim of improving performance. However, these strategies may have different impacts under various training conditions. For instance, weighted vests are typically used on the torso and can carry larger weights, while wearable resistance is usually applied to the limbs, such as the forearms, calves, and thighs, carrying relatively smaller weights but increasing the rotational inertia of the limbs. The main objective of the paper is to systematically review the literature to find intervention studies that report the effects of weighted vests and wearable resistance on sprint performance and kinematic characteristics in both acute and chronic states, and to conduct a comparative analysis. Using meta-analysis methods, the authors analyzed longitudinal and crossover design studies from the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and SPORTDiscuss databases. The results indicate that sprint time significantly increased and ground contact time also increased when using weighted vests and wearable resistance. However, wearable resistance led to a decrease in step frequency, while weighted vests resulted in a reduction in step length. For long-term adaptations, only one study found that wearable resistance was superior to the control group in terms of sprint time, whereas no significant long-term effects on sprint time, ground contact time, and flight time were found for weighted vests. In summary, the paper aims to evaluate the effects of wearable resistance and weighted vests on sprint performance and kinematic characteristics through systematic review and meta-analysis, and to compare the differences in the effectiveness of these two strategies.