Management Strategies for Malignant Left-Sided Colonic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Propensity Score Matching Studies
Fiachra T. McHugh,Éanna J. Ryan,Odhrán K. Ryan,Jonavan Tan,Patrick A. Boland,Maria C. Whelan,Michael E. Kelly,Deirdre McNamara,Paul C. Neary,James M. O’Riordan,Dara O. Kavanagh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000003256
2024-04-01
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
Abstract:BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for left-sided malignant colonic obstruction remains controversial. Emergency colonic resection has been the standard of care; however, self-expanding metallic stenting as a bridge to surgery may offer short-term advantages, although oncological concerns exist. Decompressing stoma may provide a valid alternative, with limited evidence. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and Bayesian arm random effects model network meta-analysis comparing the approaches for management of malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was conducted from inception to August 22, 2023, of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials and propensity score matched studies. INTERVENTIONS: Emergency colonic resection, self-expanding metallic stent, decompressing stoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oncologic efficacy, morbidity, successful minimally invasive surgery, primary anastomosis, and permanent stoma rates. RESULTS: Nineteen articles from 5225 identified met our inclusion criteria. Stenting (risk ratio 0.57, 95% credible interval: 0.33, 0.79) and decompressing stomas (risk ratio 0.46, 95% credible interval: 0.18, 0.92) both resulted in a significant reduction in the permanent stoma rate. Stenting facilitated minimally invasive surgery more frequently (risk ratio 4.10, 95% credible interval: 1.45, 13.13) and had lower overall morbidity (risk ratio 0.58, 95% credible interval: 0.35, 0.86). A pairwise analysis of primary anastomosis rates showed an increase in stenting (risk ratio 1.40, 95% credible interval: 1.31, 1.49) as compared with emergency resection. There was a significant decrease in the 90-day mortality with stenting (risk ratio 0.63, 95% credible interval: 0.41, 0.95) when compared with resection. There were no differences in disease-free and overall survival rates, respectively. LIMITATIONS: There is a lack of randomized controlled trial and propensity score matching data comparing short and long-term outcomes for diverting stomas compared to self-expanding metallic stents. Two trials compared self-expanding metallic stents and diverting stomas in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. CONCLUSION: This study provides high-level evidence that bridge-to-surgery strategy is safe for the management of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction, and may facilitate minimally invasive surgery, increase primary anastomosis rates, and reduce permanent stoma rates and postoperative morbidity as compared to emergency colonic resection.
gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery