Abstract:Introduction: Why are some individuals more likely than others to develop a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the face of similar levels of trauma exposure? Monitoring the traumatic process combining the antecedents, the determinants of the psychic trauma and the acute symptoms can clarify the causes of the final onset of a chronic repetition syndrome. Epidemiologic research has clarified risk factors that increase the likelihood of PTSD after exposure to a potentially traumatic event. PTSD is an interaction between a subject, a traumatogenic factor and a social context. With each epidemiological, psychopathological and more particularly neurogenetic study, we will expand on the impact of these interactions on the therapeutic treatment of psycho-traumatised persons. Literature findings: Most studies have shown that unrelated to the traumatic event, additional risk factors for developing PTSD include younger age at the time of the trauma, female gender, lower social economic statuts, lack of social support, premorbid personality characteristics and preexisting anxiety or depressive disorders increase the risk of PTSD. The psychic trauma is firmly attached to the repetition and the previous traumas are as many risks of developing a subsequent PTSD in the wake of a new trauma: PTSD in adults may represent a prolonged symptomatic reaction to prior traumatic assault, child abuse and childhood adversities. Related to the traumatic event, the organic pain, the traumatic brain injury, but also the sight of blood can lead to a trauma being considered as more serious or more harmful to life. It is useful to recognize the acute reactions of exhaustion stress as they can guide both the pharmacotherapeutic and the psychotherapeutic treatment thanks to debriefings. Even though the majority of people with acute stress disorder subsequently develop PTSD, the current data indicate that too many people can develop PTSD without initially displaying acute stress disorder. Though peritraumatic dissociation and peritraumatic distress have emerged as the strongest predictors for PTSD and have to be treated as soon as possible with the debriefing or the pharmacology; initial evidence suggests the potential benefits of early intervention, shortly after the trauma, and psychological debriefing has received increasing interest from the scientific community. However the Anglo-Saxon techniques (such as Critical Incident Stress Debriefing also known as the Mitchell model) are in total contrast with the French approach. In the first case the emotional response is controlled to ensure the pursuit of the group action, whilst in the second case the debriefing concerns patients with acute symptoms in order to prevent the development of a PTSD structuring of the latter. The facts, emotions and thoughts are not partitioned but inter-linked, thus enabling a fragmentation of the traumatic experience. In the face of the annihilation experienced, speech production by the subject is restored linking the person to the human community, once abandoned. However, debate continues on the efficacy of single session debriefing in the prevention of PTSD. At the time of the acute stress reactions, benzodiazepines are contraindicated at this stage as they promote dissociation and ulterior revivals. On the other hand, treatment with propranolol could be proposed: a two or three week course of propranolol begun in the aftermath of a traumatic event can reduce subsequent PTSD symptoms. Discussion: A genetic polymorphism is evidently at work in the development of a PTSD via the regulation of the expression of genes of interest to the serotoninergic system and the adrenocorticotropic axis. The 5-HTTLPR (promoter region of SLC6A4 witch encodes the serotonin transporter) constitutes a genetic candidate region that may modulate emotional responses to traumatic events. The interaction between variation at the 5HTTLPR and stressful life events could predict depression and PTSD. Considering the dopaminergic pathway, the A1 allele coding the type 2 dopaminergic receptor is associated with a severe comorbidity of PTSD with the presence of somatic disorders, anxiety, social change and depression. For noradrenergic neuromodulation, an interaction between the polymorphism of gene GABRA2 and the occurrence of PTSD is described whereas an interaction between the number of traumatic events and Val(158)Met polymorphism of the gene coding for catecholamine-o-methyltransferase has also been found. The role of polymorphisms in FKBP5 (a co-chaperone of hsp 90 which binds to the glucocorticoid receptor) in predicting PTSD too, with a gene-by-environment point of view. These gene-by-environment studies are needed to focus more on distinct endophenotypes and influences from environmental factors. If several candidate genes are involved, a weighting of susceptibility to such and such a neurological regulation system will imply various endophenotypes. According to the monoamine predominantly incriminated, PTSD can take on a more hyper-vegetative clinical expression linked with noradrenergic overuse. Differently, avoidance behaviour and the depressive aspect invoke more a modification of the serotoninergic modulation whilst posttraumatic psychotic reactions question the role of dopaminergic pathways. Neuroscientific discoveries interesting the biological support of PTSD can thus modify our view of the conception of the disorder in relation to different therapeutic prospects. Conclusion: Chronic PTSD can manifest itself in different clinical forms. The repetition syndrome can appear a long time after the traumatic event, following a paucisymptomatic latency period, which can last several years or even decades. The absence of complaints from the patient is common, the latter suffering in silence. Often other comorbid disorders and other complaints arise sooner than the clinical picture. Thus a depressive episode characterised as drug-seeking behaviour is frequently encountered. The therapeutic accompaniment traditionally combines a pharmacological and a psychotherapeutic treatment even if recommendations are rare. A posttraumatic stress disorder is never just a coincidence. The different stages of the evolution and the establishment of a PTSD are the expression of an interaction between the outside and the inner self. Despite a known progression of the posttraumatic stress disorder, this deleterious evolution is far from being a foregone conclusion. On the contrary, several levels of prevention are possible at each stage of its structuration to propose treatments to subjects who are vulnerable and/or present symptoms. No neurobiological study has yet found a biological marker, which would apparently and inevitably destine a subject to structure, a posttraumatic stress disorder in reaction to a stress. Conversely, the psychopathological study finds afterwards that a particular subject has necessarily built a traumatic repetition syndrome according to the concordance of significant data relative to his/her history. The event strikes a repression or an anterior biographical deadlock and of which the thematic questions the fundamentals of human culture in its emancipation with nature, like the question of death and its consequences: bereavement, parentality, transgenerational transmission and organicity often linked to the illness. A therapeutic proposal constitutes an environmental factor par excellence which can be either protective or deleterious. If the traumatic repetition syndrome has been known since Antiquity, the birth of PTSD has followed the chronology of the DSM according to the sociopolitical contexts encountered. A PTSD does not occur by chance: the conditions of possibility of the trauma are established by genetic and psychological determinants interactively integrated at the heart of a social context. After the increase in a psychotraumatic interest in international publications since the 1980s, a fight against over-victimisation seems to be setting in. The advances in genetic and neuroimaging techniques are in the process of superseding psychometric studies in terms of reliability and validity; maybe we should see in this social evolution the changes of tomorrow concerning the clinical of PTSD and its treatment. The healing of the psycho-traumatised subject cannot just be established on the passive status of victim, which would be detrimental to reflection and ultimately reconstruction: the rebirth of the subject will require active commitment, which could distract from the deadly repetition. Whilst the confrontation with death resembled nonsense, the subject will question the psychotraumatic determinants of his/her life history to reinstate this tragic event within a search for meaning. Such restructuring is built on the intersubjectivity of the clinical relationship, which occurs within a social context. PTSD is a pathology which interacts with the societal context: on the one hand the trauma is established on the brutal reconsideration of social values which seem immutable and on the other hand, the clinical and nosographical concept of PTSD is changing with the evolution of society.

Abstract:Objectifs L’objectif de cet article est de préciser les spécificités de l’approche psychanalytique du traumatisme, à partir de l’étude d’un cas clinique unique. Là où les discours contemporains tendent à souligner le rôle des évènements vécus dans la survenue d’un tableau psychopathologique, nous chercherons à montrer comment la psychanalyse opère un décentrement vis-à-vis des modèles explicatifs déterministes et linéaires. Â partir du cas d’un patient psychotique d’une cinquantaine d’années ayant perdu la vue suite à une blessure par arme à feu, nous montrerons comment la psychanalyse propose de mettre l’accent non pas intrinsèquement sur l’évènement passé, mais sur la réponse singulière et toujours imprévisible du sujet, dans une perspective diachronique prenant en compte l’importance de la temporalité et de l’après-coup. Nous pourrons ainsi étudier comment chez ce patient, l’évènement traumatique est progressivement réintégré dans une construction subjective singulière, et nous tenterons d’appréhender les ressorts stabilisateurs de cette construction au prisme de l’hypothèse freudienne du délire comme « tentative de guérison ». Méthode La méthode que nous avons adoptée est celle de l’étude d’un cas unique, dans la mesure où elle est la seule à pouvoir rendre compte de la singularité de la réponse du sujet dans son caractère diachronique. Il s’agira en particulier d’assumer le style d’une écriture analytique du cas qui s’écarte de tout idéal d’objectivité scientifique, puisque la technique psychanalytique se caractérise par la place majeure accordée à la dimension transférentielle dans la cure, et engage de fait la subjectivité du thérapeute. Nous nous efforcerons ainsi de restituer l’histoire de ce patient dans son déploiement temporel, en relatant les éléments biographiques et anamnestique tels qu’ils sont apparus au travers de la rencontre clinique, en y intégrant également des éléments issus de la consultation d’archives des dossiers médicaux. Nous étudierons ensuite l’évolution de sa position subjective au prisme des développements freudiens et lacaniens sur la psychose. Résultats Une approche psychanalytique a permis de mettre en évidence que, chez ce patient, sa position d’objet d’un préjudice est antérieure à la survenue de son agression par arme à feu. Cet évènement sera ainsi dans un premier temps réintégré par le sujet dans le cadre de la logique du délire de persécution qui le précède. Néanmoins, la reconnaissance sociale de sa position de victime a pu induire chez lui un effet pacificateur, et il réinterprètera dans un second temps cet évènement à partir de la construction d’une position d’exception, par l’incarnation de la figure du « voyant », qui viendra jouer un rôle de nomination et conduira à l’apaisement significatif des angoisses de persécution. Au-delà de l’hypothèse d’une « déduction logique » de la mégalomanie à partir des idées délirantes de persécution en vigueur dans la psychiatrie classique, la théorie freudienne et lacanienne permettent de situer les ressorts de cette position d’exception relativement à l’économie libidinale du sujet. Discussion Nous proposerons de discuter des similitudes existant entre la position d’exception construite par ce patient et deux cas célèbres de la littérature psychanalytique : le Président Schreber, auteur des Mémoires d’un névropathe, et l’écrivain irlandais James Joyce. Il s’agira en particulier de montrer que la construction délirante de notre patient diffère de la logique du « pousse-à-la-femme » à l’œuvre chez Schreber, et qu’elle n’est pas analogue non plus à la production d’un sinthome borroméen. En effet, sa construction délirante (contrairement à l’œuvre produite par Joyce) ne permet pas de le réinscrire dans une forme de lien social. Néanmoins, le travail thérapeutique réalisé avec ce patient lors de sa dernière hospitalisation permet de préciser comment la relation transférentielle peut dans certains cas permettre au patient psychotique de se saisir du thérapeute comme d’un partenaire qui viendrait authentifier l’advenue d’une position d’énonciation, ainsi que la production d’une nomination par le travail du délire. Conclusion La méthode du cas unique permet de mettre en évidence que l’approche psychanalytique du traumatisme opère un décentrement vis-à-vis de toute perspective tendant à faire de l’évènement traumatique le ressort causal du tableau psychopathologique. L’abord de l’histoire du patient dans sa globalité et sa complexité permet ainsi au contraire de mettre l’accent sur la réponse unique et imprévisible du sujet. La logique temporelle de l’après-coup freudien implique en effet de reconsidérer dans une perspective dynamique et diachronique la rencontre entre le sujet et l’évènement, en prenant en compte le déjà-là de la structure, l’histoire singulière du sujet, mais aussi les potentialités créatrices et imprévisibles de chacun – la relation thérapeutique pouvant apparaître comme une quatrième dimension lorsqu’elle vient offrir un support à cette création subjective et l’accompagne. The objective of this article is to clarify the specificities of the psychoanalytic approach to trauma, based on the study of a single clinical case. Whereas contemporary discourses tend to emphasize the role of lived events in the emergence of a psychopathological picture, we aim to demonstrate how psychoanalysis operates a shift in perspective vis-à-vis deterministic and linear explanatory models. Focusing on the case of a psychotic patient in his fifties who had lost his sight following a gunshot wound, we demonstrate how psychoanalysis invites us not to place the emphasis intrinsically on a past event. Rather, it suggests looking at the singular and unpredictable response of the subject as an individual, in a diachronic perspective that takes into account the importance of temporality and hindsight. In this way, I was able to study how this patient gradually integrated the traumatic event into a singular subjective construct. In turn, this allowed me to understand the stabilizing mechanisms of this construct, through the prism of the Freudian hypothesis of delusion as an “attempt at healing”. Method The method I adopted is that of the single case study. This approach was chosen as it is the only one that can illustrate the singularity of the subject's response in its diachronic character. In particular, I deliberately chose the style of an analytical case study. This differs from the ideal of scientific objectivity insofar as the psychoanalytic technique is characterized by the importance given to the transferential dimension in the cure, and thus calls upon the subjectivity of the therapist. Thus, I endeavored to reconstruct the history of this patient in its diachronic unfolding, by recounting the biographical and anamnestic elements as they appeared during the clinical encounter. To support this further, I integrated elements from the archival consultation of medical records. I then studied the evolution of the patient's subjective position through the prism of Freudian and Lacanian theories on psychosis. Results A psychoanalytic approach made it possible to demonstrate that in this patient, his position as the object of an injury predated the occurrence of his wounding by firearm. This later event was thus initially reintegrated, by him, within the framework of the logic of the delusion of persecution that predated it. Nevertheless, the social recognition of his position as a victim may have induced in him a pacifying effect. He was able to reinterpret the event in the aftermath, based on the construct of a position of exception. In that position, he assumed the figure of the ‘seer’ who played the role of naming, leading to a significant appeasement of the persecution anxieties. Discussion Here I propose a discussion of the possible similarities between the position of exception constructed by this patient, and the cases of President Schreber and the writer James Joyce. In particular, my aim was to show that the delusional construction of my patient differed from the logic of the ‘pousse-à-la-femme,’ and that it was also not analogous to the production of a Borromean sinthome. This was because his delusional construct did not enable his re-inscription into any form of social bond. Nevertheless, the therapeutic work carried out with this patient during his last hospitalization made it possible to pinpoint how the transferential relationship can, in some cases, help the psychotic patient to make use of the therapist as a partner. Such a partner authenticates the advent of a position of enunciation, and the action of naming through the process of delusion. Conclusion The single case method made it possible to demonstrate that the psychoanalytic approach to trauma offsets any tendency to make the traumatic event the causal root of the psychopathological picture. By looking at the patient's history in its entirety and its complexity, it was possible to emphasize the unique and unpredictable nature of the subject's response. The temporal logic of Freudian hindsight calls for a re-evaluation of the encounter between the subject and the event from a dynamic and diachronic perspective. Such a re-evaluation takes into account structures that are already in place, the singularity of the subject's history, as well as the unpredictable creative potential of each individual. In addition, the therapeutic relationship may form a fourth aspect, when it becomes a support and accompaniment to the subjective creation.

Treatment of post-traumatic psychiatric disorders: A continuum of immediate, post-immediate and follow-up care mediated by specific psychotherapeutic principles. Clinical experience in French-speaking countries

[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context]

[Psychosis and trauma. Theorical links between post-traumatic and psychotic symptoms]

Le Centre Régional de Psychotraumatisme Paris Centre et Sud : quel profil psychotraumatique pour les victimes appelant sa plateforme téléphonique ?

Recognition of the neurobiological insults imposed by complex trauma and the implications for psychotherapeutic interventions

New approaches to combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder

The effectiveness of trauma-focused psychotherapy for complex post-traumatic stress disorder: A retrospective study

Le cas de Monsieur Y. : du traumatisme à l’exception

Latest developments in post-traumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and treatment

The drug treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder

Differences in predictive factors for post-traumatic stress disorder encompassing partial PTSD and full PTSD: a cross-sectional study among individuals exposed to the November 13, 2015 Paris attacks

Effectiveness of an intensive treatment programme combining prolonged exposure and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for severe post-traumatic stress disorder

Ideal Parent Figure method in the treatment of complex posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood trauma: a pilot study

Prevention of posttraumatic stress disorder by early treatment: results from the Jerusalem Trauma Outreach And Prevention study

Analyze the factors that influence the therapeutic response to psychic trauma

["When we have to make sense to the nonsense of trauma" Psychological intervention among shooting victims of January 29, 2017. Multicultural perspective]

Neurobiology and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

[Psychological interventions in the field of neurotraumatology during the acute care]

Improvements of complex post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms during a multimodal psychodynamic inpatient rehabilitation treatment - results of an observational single-centre pilot study

"It hurt but it helped": A mixed methods audit of the implementation of trauma- focused cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis

Preliminary study of a new integrative approach in treating post-traumatic stress disorder: SEE FAR CBT