Early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT and molecular phenotypes of breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Bhumsuk Keam,Seock-Ah Im,Youngil Koh,Sae-Won Han,Do-Youn Oh,Nariya Cho,Jee Hyun Kim,Wonshik Han,Keon Wook Kang,Woo Kyung Moon,Tae-You Kim,In Ae Park,Dong-Young Noh,June-Key Chung,Yung-Jue Bang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-452
IF: 4.638
2011-10-20
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Abstract Background This study was aimed 1) to investigate the predictive value of FDG PET/CT (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography) for histopathologic response and 2) to explore the results of FDG PET/CT by molecular phenotypes of breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Seventy-eight stage II or III breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. FDG PET/CTs were acquired before chemotherapy and after the first cycle of chemotherapy for evaluating early metabolic response. Results The mean pre- and post-chemotherapy standard uptake value (SUV) were 7.5 and 3.9, respectively. The early metabolic response provided by FDG PET/CT after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the histopathologic response after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( P = 0.002). Sensitivity and negative predictive value were 85.7% and 95.1%, respectively. The estrogen receptor negative phenotype had a higher pre-chemotherapy SUV (8.6 vs . 6.4, P = 0.047) and percent change in SUV (48% vs . 30%, P = 0.038). In triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the pre-chemotherapy SUV was higher than in non-TNBC (9.8 vs . 6.4, P = 0.008). Conclusions The early metabolic response using FDG PET/CT could have a predictive value for the assessment of histopathologic non-response of stage II/III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our findings suggest that the initial SUV and the decline in SUV differed based on the molecular phenotype. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01396655
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?