The oldest-old in China - Authors' reply.
Yi Zeng,Qiushi Feng,Therese Hesketh,Kaare Christensen,James W Vaupel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31829-9
2017-01-01
Abstract:We agree with Fuzhong Li and Peter Harmer that our data1Zeng Y Feng Q Hesketh T Christensen K Vaupel JW Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study.Lancet. 2017; 389: 1619-1629Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (299) Google Scholar have limitations, including the unmeasured burden of non-communicable disease. In fact, we acknowledge this in our paper, and conclude that “further studies need to include chronic diseases”. Li and Harmer also point out that we did not assess the magnitude of rural–urban differences, and Tomohiro Morita and colleagues describe our rural–urban dichotomy as “too simplistic”. We agree that an investigation of rural–urban differences is important, which is why we adjusted for rural–urban residence as a covariate in our study. We would like to point out that it might not be appropriate to divide the data into rural and urban subsamples, because it would cut the sample size by about half, and make the subsample data not fully compatible between 1998 and 2008 because of rural–urban migration. Morita and colleagues correctly point out that the Global Burden of Disease Study showed China can be divided into five areas, and suggest we consider this. However, besides the fact that the division of data would largely reduce the statistical power because of a much smaller sample size, there are wide disparities within each of the five areas, so we believe such analysis would be unhelpful. Adjustment for rural and urban residence plus education, although imperfect, captures most socioeconomic disparities. We disagree with Li and Harmer's comment that our ascribing of greater longevity or lower mortality among the oldest-old to benefits of success is “problematic because no valid measure of health status exists for this population”. The standard activities of daily living and objective tests of physical performance and cognitive function are valid measures of health status strongly associated with survival. We believe Li and Harmer's comment that “the costs of success hypothesis might not be tenable because of the lack of key measures, such as non-communicable disease” is invalid, because: the costs of success is an interpretation of the decline in average scores of physical performance and cognitive function as the survival of more frail, elderly individuals with health problems, rather than a hypothesis to be tested; and, a lack of non-communicable disease data does not prevent analysis of changes in the health status of physical and cognitive abilities. We agree with Morita and colleagues that “the information about family members who support an oldest-old individual is of concern”; however, we did adjust for marital status (ie, living with or without spouse), and thus the effects of family member support are controlled for, to some extent. Additionally, some studies indicate elderly-only households can increase risk of dementia and disability,2Li LW Zhang J Liang J Health among the oldest-old in China: which living arrangements make a difference?.Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68: 220-227Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar, 3Schulz R Sherwood PR Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving.Am J Nurs. 2008; 108: 23-27Crossref PubMed Scopus (593) Google Scholar whereas others show that elderly people who live alone might be selectively in better health because of different context and motivations.4Yeung WJ Cheung AK Living alone: One-person households in Asia.Demographic Res. 2015; 32: 1099-1112Crossref Scopus (76) Google Scholar We declare no competing interests. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort studyAdvances in medications, lifestyle, and socioeconomics might compress activities of daily living disability, that is, benefits of success, but lifespan extension might expand disability of physical and cognitive functioning as more frail, elderly individuals survive with health problems, that is, costs of success. Full-Text PDF The oldest-old in ChinaIn The Lancet (April 22, p 1619), Yi Zeng and colleagues1 focus on an important segment of the rapidly ageing population in China. From a public health perspective, their study is valuable because the oldest-old age group represents the most neglected and socially disadvantaged people, who have the greatest burden of non-communicable disease, in Chinese society. Full-Text PDF The oldest-old in ChinaYi Zeng and colleagues1 analysed three pairs of oldest-old Chinese cohorts born 10 years apart, and showed coexistence and mixed effects of compression of disability in activities of daily living, and expansion of disability in physical and cognitive functioning with increased longevity. We propose two additional viewpoints to enhance the significance of this research. Full-Text PDF