Characterizing the acute heat stress response in gilts: II. Assessing repeatability and association with fertility

Kody L Graves,Jacob T Seibert,Aileen F Keating,Lance H Baumgard,Jason W Ross
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx037
2018-06-04
Abstract:Mitigating heat stress (HS) in swine production is important as it detrimentally affects multiple aspects of overall animal production efficiency. Study objectives were to determine if gilts characterized as tolerant (TOL) or susceptible (SUS) in response to HS maintain that phenotype later in life and if that phenotype influences reproductive ability during HS. Individual gilts identified as TOL (n = 50) or SUS (n = 50) from a prepubertal HS challenge were selected based on their rectal temperature (TR) during acute HS. The study consisted of 4 experimental periods (P). During P0 (2 d), all pigs were exposed to thermoneutral (TN) conditions (21.1 °C). During P1 (14 d), all gilts received Matrix (15 mg altrenogest per day) to synchronize estrus, and were maintained in TN conditions. During P2 (9 d), Matrix supplementation was terminated and gilts were subjected to diurnal HS with ambient temperatures set at 35 °C from 1000 to 2200 h and 21 °C from 2200 to 1000 h. Also during P2 gilts underwent estrus detection and artificial insemination. During P3 gilts were housed in TN conditions for 41 d at which they were sacrificed and reproductive tracts were collected. During the last 2 d of P1 and throughout the entirety of P2, TR and skin temperature (TS) were recorded. During P2, SUS had increased TR relative to TOL pigs during P2 (0.27 °C; P < 0.01). Overall, uterine wet weight, ovarian weight, corpora lutea (CL) count, and embryo survival were 5.6 ± 0.1 kg, 21.6 ± 0.3 g, 17.8 ± 0.3 CLs, and 79 ± 2%, respectively, and not influenced by prepubertal HS tolerance classification (P ≥ 0.37). Tolerant gilts had a longer return-to-estrus (6.1 vs. 5.5 d, respectively; P = 0.01) following altrenogest withdrawal and tended to have larger CL diameters (10.3 vs. 10.1 mm; P = 0.06) compared to SUS gilts. Fetal weight (25.4 vs. 23.6 g; P = 0.01) and fetal crown-rump length (74.8 vs. 72.8 mm; P < 0.01) were higher in gilts previously classified as SUS compared to those previously classified as TOL. Additionally, neither litter size nor the number of fetuses detected as a percentage of ovulations was influenced by classification. In summary, SUS gilts had a shorter return-to-estrus, increased fetus size, and tended to have smaller CL diameters compared to TOL gilts. Additionally, SUS gilts also retained their inability to maintain euthermia postpubertally relative to TOL gilts. In conclusion, there appeared to be little reproductive advantage of maintaining a lower TR during HS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?