2% Crisaborole Ointment for the Treatment of Chronic Cheilitis Caused by Lip Tattoos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.s465630
IF: 4.5
2024-05-27
Journal of Inflammation Research
Abstract:Xu Liu, 1, &ast Qingfeng Liu, 1, &ast Linghong Guo, 1 Xian Jiang 1, 2 1 Department of Dermatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China; 2 Laboratory of Dermatology, Clinical Institute of Inflammation and Immunology, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Xian Jiang; Linghong Guo, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, &num37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-28-85423315, Fax +86-28-85422560, Email ; The increasing popularity of tattoo art, including facial cosmetic tattoos, has led to a growing societal acceptance of tattoos. However, complications such as lip inflammation following cosmetic lip tattoos remain a concern. This article presents the case of a 47-year-old Asian woman who experienced recurrent lip swelling, purulent discharge, and scarring after receiving lip tattoos. Despite previous treatment with corticosteroid injections yielding unsatisfactory results, the patient showed significant improvement with topical application of 2% Crisaborole, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor. Crisaborole modulates intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels, thereby reducing tissue inflammation and swelling associated with chronic cheilitis. Additionally, pulse laser therapy was effective in addressing residual tattoo pigment and scar tissue. This case highlights the therapeutic challenges of managing chronic inflammatory diseases of the lips secondary to cosmetic tattoos and introduces Crisaborole as a promising treatment option, offering insights for managing similar conditions in the future. Keywords: lip tattoo, chronic cheilitis, Crisaborole, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, laser therapy As tattoo art gains increasing popularity, society's acceptance of tattoos is also growing. In particular, there is a notable market demand for facial cosmetic tattoos. However, various complications can arise following this procedure, with lip inflammation being one of the most common. The primary causes include mechanical irritation during the tattooing process, allergic reactions to components in the tattoo ink, and post-tattoo infections. Tattoo inks often contain a complex mixture of inorganic and organic pigments, solvents, additives, and contaminants, which can trigger adverse reactions in some individuals. 1 The most common tattoo pigments associated with allergic reactions are red, yellow, and orange, which frequently contain mercury sulfide (cinnabar), cadmium sulfide, and organic dyes. 2 Patients may exhibit symptoms such as redness, itching, swelling, and papules. 3 The frequency of chronic inflammatory reactions to tattoos is estimated to be around 1–5%. 4,5 A 47-year-old Asian woman experienced recurrent lip swelling, purulent discharge, and scarring one year after receiving cosmetic lip tattoos. The tattoo ink primarily contained water, butanediol, isopropyl myristate, cyclopentasiloxane, pigments, methylparaben, and propylparaben. The patient had no significant past medical or family history. The symptoms first appeared 3 months post-tattooing and recurred every 1–2 months. Her primary care physician administered local corticosteroid injections (triamcinolone) to the affected site once a month for three months, but the patient reported no noticeable improvement. Physical examination revealed bright redness and swelling of both lips, accompanied by visible scarring. The affected area exhibited peeling skin and a small amount of yellow purulent discharge, limited to the tattooed region (Figure 1A). A bacterial culture of the purulent discharge was performed to rule out any secondary infection, which came back negative. Dermoscopy showed irregularly distributed white structures, distinct prominent branching vessels, white scales, yellow crusts, exudate, and, in some areas, gray-brown dot-like pigment deposition (Figure 2A). Despite the option of a skin biopsy, the patient opted against it. Considering the dermoscopic findings along with the medical history, the clinical diagnosis leaned towards chronic cheilitis with scarring secondary to an allergic reaction to the red tattoo pigment, likely mercury sulfide. Figure 1 Various stages of treatment for the Case. ( A ) Baseline; ( B ) After two months of treatment with 2% Crisaborole Ointment; ( C ) After undergoing one session of Q-switched 532nm Nd:YAG laser treatment. Figure 2 Various stages of treatment for the Case. ( A ) Baseline; (<st -Abstract Truncated-
immunology