Predicting response to checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma beyond PD-L1 and mutational burden

Carl Morrison,Sarabjot Pabla,Jeffrey M Conroy,Mary K Nesline,Sean T Glenn,Devin Dressman,Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos,Blake Burgher,Jonathan Andreas,Vincent Giamo,Moachun Qin,Yirong Wang,Felicia L Lenzo,Angela Omilian,Wiam Bshara,Matthew Zibelman,Pooja Ghatalia,Konstantin Dragnev,Keisuke Shirai,Katherine G Madden,Laura J Tafe,Neel Shah,Deepa Kasuganti,Luis de la Cruz-Merino,Isabel Araujo,Yvonne Saenger,Margaret Bogardus,Miguel Villalona-Calero,Zuanel Diaz,Roger Day,Marcia Eisenberg,Steven M Anderson,Igor Puzanov,Lorenzo Galluzzi,Mark Gardner,Marc S Ernstoff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0344-8
2018-05-09
Abstract:Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the clinical management of melanoma. However, not all patients respond, and current biomarkers including PD-L1 and mutational burden show incomplete predictive performance. The clinical validity and utility of complex biomarkers have not been studied in melanoma. Methods: Cutaneous metastatic melanoma patients at eight institutions were evaluated for PD-L1 expression, CD8+ T-cell infiltration pattern, mutational burden, and 394 immune transcript expression. PD-L1 IHC and mutational burden were assessed for association with overall survival (OS) in 94 patients treated prior to ICI approval by the FDA (historical-controls), and in 137 patients treated with ICIs. Unsupervised analysis revealed distinct immune-clusters with separate response rates. This comprehensive immune profiling data were then integrated to generate a continuous Response Score (RS) based upon response criteria (RECIST v.1.1). RS was developed using a single institution training cohort (n = 48) and subsequently tested in a separate eight institution validation cohort (n = 29) to mimic a real-world clinical scenario. Results: PD-L1 positivity ≥1% correlated with response and OS in ICI-treated patients, but demonstrated limited predictive performance. High mutational burden was associated with response in ICI-treated patients, but not with OS. Comprehensive immune profiling using RS demonstrated higher sensitivity (72.2%) compared to PD-L1 IHC (34.25%) and tumor mutational burden (32.5%), but with similar specificity. Conclusions: In this study, the response score derived from comprehensive immune profiling in a limited melanoma cohort showed improved predictive performance as compared to PD-L1 IHC and tumor mutational burden.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?