Abstract:Abstract A 35-year-old nail and beauty technician presented with severe hand and finger dermatitis. She had a 5-year history of eczema on her neck and trunk, which had improved with avoidance of balsam of Peru, to which she had previously tested positive on patch testing. Unfortunately, the patient began experiencing debilitating hand symptoms 2 years ago, escalating into painful, cracked, excoriated and fissured hands. Further patch testing revealed positive reactions to acrylates, specifically 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, and triethylene glycol diacrylate – common components in acrylic, gel and shellac nail products used daily in her profession. Advised on strict allergen avoidance, the patient hesitated, citing practicality concerns given her lack of alternative income sources and qualifications. Reluctant to undergo a period of avoidance, she grappled with accepting her occupation as a likely source of her hand dermatitis and was keen to explore alternative options. Occupational acrylate allergy poses challenges for nail technicians, with symptoms often proving difficult to control once sensitized. Rapid acrylate penetration through most glove types complicates protective measures. Nitrile gloves offer marginally longer protection compared with latex, while laminate 4H gloves provide superior defence but limit manual dexterity. A study exploring an in vivo model for glove efficacy used open chambers filled with the acrylate gels, which were applied to the back with tape, and gloves attached as a membrane between the gel and the skin [Ursberg AM, Bergendorff O, Thorsson AC, Isaksson M. Is there a good in vivo method to show whether gloves are sufficiently protective when a nail technician is exposed to (meth)acrylates? An in vivo pilot study. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 75: 62–5]. The glove materials were then tested at four exposure times. This study showed promise in ascertaining which gloves offered appropriate protection for an individual, but is limited in practicality due to its prolonged duration. Applying the results from the study to clinical practice, the patient was first treated with oral steroids to clear her hands, and was then recommended to double glove during procedures. She was advised to ensure that she spent no more than 20 min with each client, in order to reduce penetration time of the acrylate through the gloves. This, along with frequent handwashing in between clients and regular workspace cleaning, has allowed her to successfully continue her career for the last 3 years. This case underscores the importance of finding collaborative solutions with patients, even if not medically ideal, and offering practical approaches for individuals facing challenging allergens to avoid. This case also highlights the usefulness of applying basic science research to clinical practice for the benefit of patients.

[Individual prevention of occupational contact dermatitis: protective gloves and skin protection recommendations as part of the patient management scheme by the public statutory employers' liability insurance]

[Occupational skin cancer : Prevention and recommendations for UV protection as part of the treatment approved by the public statutory employers' liability insurance]

Tertiary prevention of occupational skin diseases: Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and pattern of patch test results

[Sustainability in occupational dermatology : Starting points, challenges, and potentials for sustainable care of work-related skin diseases]

COVID-19-Related Risk Factors for Developing Occupational Contact Dermatitis Along With Its Incidence, Prevention, and Management: A Systematic Review

Occupational contact allergy: The European perspective-Analysis of patch test data from ESSCA between 2011 and 2020

Epidemiological case‐control study on contact sensitisation in female foot care specialists with occupational contact dermatitis: Patch test data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 2008 to 2022

Occupational palmoplantar psoriasis: a clinical case series with consideration of the S1 guidelines on expert medical assessments of occupational psoriasis

Patch testing in occupational dermatology: Practical aspects in relation to the conditions in Germany

Economic evaluation of a tertiary prevention program for occupational skin diseases in Germany

A case study of dermatitis based on a collaborative approach between occupational physicians and industrial hygienists

CD12 A case of occupational acrylate allergy: a success story!

Hand Eczema. Part 2: Prevention, management, and treatment

Characterization of Cleaning and Disinfection Product Use, Glove Use, and Skin Disorders by Healthcare Occupations in a Midwestern Healthcare Facility

Occupational Dermatoses Related to Personal Protective Equipment Used During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Update on occupational dermatitis: reviewing toxic substances from OSHA standards

Contact dermatitis caused by prevention measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review

Prospective Study on the Influence of Occupational Hand Protection Products on the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection

[Occupational Dermatoses in Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review]

Awareness of occupational skin disease in the service sector

Detection of Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis by Patch Testing.