Bibliometric study of articles on skeletal Class II malocclusions published in four high impact factor journals

Lahcen Ousehal,Amal El Aouame,Nassiba Fatene,Laila Lazrak,Loubna Traiba,Papa Ibrahima N'Gom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.011
Abstract:Objective: Perform a bibliometric analysis of the orthodontic literature on skeletal Class II malocclusions during the first decade of the 21st century. Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational, and comprehensive study ranging from January the first 2001 to December 31 2010, based on the articles published in four high impact factor orthodontic journals: Angle Orthod, OCR, EJO, and AJODO (Quotation Report Newspaper of the Scientific Information Institute). Results: In the 4565 reviewed articles, only 338 were published on Class II malocclusions. Brazil, the United States, Turkey, and Germany are the nationalities, which have published the most. The cross-sectional descriptive studies represent 33%, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) 10.5%, meta-analyses 0.3%. Discussion and conclusion: Kanavakis et al. (2006) reported 72.34% of original articles, 2.83% of synthetic reviews, 8.89% of case reports, and 15.75% of unclassifiable articles. In conclusion, searchers in Orthodontics are invited to publish more clinical trials on skeletal Class II malocclusions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?