Phase I study of sapanisertib (CB‐228/TAK‐228/MLN0128) in combination with ziv‐aflibercept in patients with advanced solid tumors

Niamh Coleman,Bettzy Stephen,Siqing Fu,Daniel Karp,Vivek Subbiah,Jordi Rodon Ahnert,Sarina A Piha-Paul,John Wright,Senait N Fessahaye,Fengying Ouyang,Bulent Yilmaz,Funda Meric-Bernstam,Aung Naing,Sarina A. Piha‐Paul,Senait N. Fessahaye,Funda Meric‐Bernstam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6877
IF: 4.711
2024-02-25
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:The AKT pathway is frequently dysregulated in human cancer. This Phase 1 dose‐escalation/expansion study assessed safety/ tolerability of sapanisertib in combination with ziv‐aflibercept in advanced solid tumors. The combination of sapanisertib and ziv‐aflibercept was generally tolerable and demonstrated anti‐tumor activity in heavily pre‐treated patients with advanced malignancies. Background Sapanisertib is a potent ATP‐competitive, dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2. Ziv‐aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein comprising human VEGF receptor extracellular domains fused to human immunoglobulin G1. HIF‐1α inhibition in combination with anti‐angiogenic therapy is a promising anti‐tumor strategy. This Phase 1 dose‐escalation/expansion study assessed safety/ tolerability of sapanisertib in combination with ziv‐aflibercept in advanced solid tumors. Methods Fifty‐five patients with heavily pre‐treated advanced metastatic solid tumors resistant or refractory to standard treatment received treatment on a range of dose levels. Results Fifty‐five patients were enrolled and treated across a range of dose levels. Forty were female (73%), median age was 62 (range: 21–79), and ECOG PS was 0 (9, 16%) or 1 (46, 84%). Most common tumor types included ovarian (8), colorectal (8), sarcoma (8), breast (3), cervical (4), and endometrial (4). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 2–11). Sapanisertib 4 mg orally 3 days on and 4 days off plus 3 mg/kg ziv‐aflibercept IV every 2 weeks on a 28‐day cycle was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Most frequent treatment‐related grade ≥2 adverse events included hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, hypertriglyceridemia, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and serum lipase increase. There were no grade 5 events. In patients with evaluable disease (n = 50), 37 patients (74%) achieved stable disease (SD) as best response, two patients (4%) achieved a confirmed partial response (PR); disease control rate (DCR) (CR + SD + PR) was 78%. Conclusion The combination of sapanisertib and ziv‐aflibercept was generally tolerable and demonstrated anti‐tumor activity in heavily pre‐treated patients with advanced malignancies.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?