Field: A New Perspective of Tourism Research
SONG Qiu,YANG Zhenzhi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2015.09.012
2015-01-01
Abstract:The famous French sociologist and anthropologist Pierre Bourdieu proposed field theory. In the view of Bourdieu, field is a network or a configuration of objective relations between positions,which reflects the deference in terms of numbers and structure of capital that occupied by agents.Agents in field compete for capital in the guide of habitus. Habitus is a structuring mechanism that operates from within agents. It generates from field and in turn changes or influences field. Habitus is,in Bourdieu's words, the strategy- generating principle enabling agents to cope with unforeseen and ever-changing situations. This paper uses field theory to reveal the capital nature of tourism resources,and the position of the host and tourist together with their behavioral strategies. It also explores the causes of cultural conflict between the host and tourist, and the process and result of cultural adaption.Taking a case study of the relationship between Tibetan craftsmen and tourists, the paper uses field theory to clarify the laws underpinning the tourism phenomenon. The paper concludes that in the age of traveling, tourism resources are now regarded as a form of capital, either natural capital or cultural capital. With economic capital and human capital, the host- owned natural capital and cultural capital are combined and integrated into tourism products in a certain form and pattern. By selling the products to the tourist, the host successfully transforms the natural and cultural capital into economic capital.The contact between the host and tourist is not simply a personal interaction, but is an objective reflection of position determined by the allocation of the particular capital. Bourdieu referred to social norms or‘habitus', which is a system of lasting and transposable dispositions. Integrating past experiences, it functions at every moment as a matrix of perceptions, appreciations and actions and makes possible the achievement of infinitely diversified tasks. In the power interplay between the host and tourist, they compete for a particular interest: this social interplay―where people compete for the allocation of the particular capital―forms what Bourdieu called‘fields'. Beyond the tourist's usual environment, the tourism field is an objective relationship space formed among different positions determined by the distribution of the capital between the tourist and different tourism host members,including local government, community residents, tourism investors, tourism developers and tourism operators. The tourism essence is"man dwells poetically on this earth"; hence, the more natural capital and cultural capital that the host possesses, the better that the tourists experience. Therefore, if the host abandons those elements that form their unique culture, then they will lose their tourism foundation and will ultimately be abandoned by the tourist. The tourism field is a new social space that is very different from the traditional social space for both the host and tourist. The fixed nature of the traditional society,however, has long been internalized into both sides in the form of habitus; this forms the generative strategies of their behavior. The contradiction between the existing habitus and the tourism field eventually leads to a cultural conflict between the host and tourist. It is impossible to avoid cultural conflict in the tourism field; however, cultural adaption can effectively eliminate the barriers,exclusions and oppositions between the host and tourist. By adaption, the host can develop a new habitus that will drive the regeneration of cultural capital. The tourist's participation in the regeneration of the host's culture will fundamentally help to protect and develop the host's traditional culture.