The Virginia Commitment Law: clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized involuntarily by court order.

F. P. Lebuffe,S. I. Granger,T. Wise
1979-12-01
Abstract:Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill remains one of the most controversial issues in psychiatry.I.2.3 This controversy has coincided with sweeping changes in mental health law produced both by new legislation and by judicial decisions, changes which have affected the care of thousands of individuals. Unfortunately, there have been few empirical studies in this area. McGarry has documented a dramatic decrease in the proportion of involuntary patients in our public hospitals, but little else is known at the clinical level about the effects of recent statutory changes. 4.5 One significant question under current scrutiny is who should initiate involuntary hospitalization. In this century, most involuntary hospitalizations have been instigated by physicians, and a smaller, but significant, number have been at the order of the police or courts. A relatively recent innovation has been legislation in certain localities which enables any individual to initiate a petition for the involuntary hospitalization of a disturbed fellow citizen. Virginia adopted such a system in 1974, with the passage of the Virginia Commitment Law. Under its provisions, an individual in Virginia may be "detained," that is, held involuntarily in a hospital, for forty-eight hours for psychiatric observation. During this period of detention, the patient is given the option of accepting voluntary hospitalization. If he declines to do so, a formal" commitment" hearing takes place to determine whether involuntary hospitalization should continue. Involuntary hospitalization is initiated when a special magistrate receives a complaint about an individual's dangerous or disturbing behavior and issues a court order for detention of the individual. Although the magistrate may instead refer the complaint to the local community mental health center, which has a mobile emergency team, over two-thirds of all contacts to the court magistrate about a
What problem does this paper attempt to address?