Abstract:Most people encounter art images as digital reproductions on a computer screen instead of as originals in a museum or gallery. With the development of digital technologies, high-resolution artworks can be accessed anywhere and anytime by a large number of viewers. Since these digital images depict the same content and are attributed to the same artist as the original, it is often implicitly assumed that their aesthetic evaluation will be similar. When it comes to the digital reproductions of art, however, it is also obvious that reproductions do differ from the originals in various aspects. Besides image quality, resolution, and format, the most obvious change is in the representation of color. The effects of subjectively varying surface-level image features on art evaluation have not been clearly assessed. To address this gap, we compare the evaluation of digital reproductions of 16 expressionist and impressionist paintings manipulated to have a high color saturation vs. a saturation similar to the original. We also investigate the impact of viewing time (100 ms vs. unrestricted viewing time) and expertise (art experts vs. laypersons), two other aspects that may impact the perception of art in online contexts. Moreover, we link these dimensions to a recent model of aesthetic experience [the Vienna Integrated Model of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes in Art Perception (VIMAP)]. Results suggest that color saturation does not exert a major influence on liking. Cognitive and emotional aspects (interest, confusion, surprise, and boredom), however, are affected - to different extents for experts and laypersons. For laypersons, the increase in color saturation led to more positive assessments of an artwork, whereas it resulted in increased confusion for art experts. This insight is particularly important when it comes to reproducing artworks digitally. Depending on the intended use, increasing or decreasing the color saturation of the digitally reproduced image might be most appropriate. We conclude with a discussion of these findings and address the question of why empirical aesthetics requires more precise dimensions to better understand the subtle processes that take place in the perception of today's digitally reproduced art environment.

Color constancy of color reproductions in art paintings

Impact of Illumination Correlated Color Temperature, Background Lightness, and Painting Color Content on Color Appearance and Appreciation of Paintings

Aesthetic Evaluation of Digitally Reproduced Art Images

How Colour Qualities of LED Lightings in A Museum Affect the Visual Impacts of Paintings

A Revised Formulation Based on CIECAM16 for Cross-media Colour Reproduction Via Real Scene Experiment

Color constancy in real-world settings

Relaxed Color Reproduction under Different Illuminant Conditions

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition at Different Chromaticities

Investigation of colour appearance models for illumination changes across media

Colour expectations across illumination changes

EFFECT OF LIGHT LEVEL ON COLOR PREFERNECE AND SPECIFICAITON OF LIGHT SOURCE COLOR RENDITION

Consideration of Light Level in Specifying Light Source Color Rendition

The Impact of Led Lighting Parameters on Viewing Fine Art Paintings

Color Difference Thresholds for Cross-Media Color Image Reproductions

Testing the Performance of the CIECAM16 for Cross-Media Colour Reproduction Using Real Scene Experiment

Change of Gamut Size for Producing Preferred Color Appearance from 20 to 15000 Lux

Cultural Preferences to Color Quality of Illumination of Different Objects

Human Perceptions of Colour Rendition Vary with Average Fidelity, Average Gamut, and Gamut Shape

Change of Color Appearance Due to Extremely High Light Level: Corresponding Colors under 100 and 3000 Cd/m2

Museum Lighting: Design Main-Colour Based Colour Rendering Index

Liking of art and the perception of color.