Developmentally Regulated Glucosylation of Bitter Triterpenoid in Cucumber by the UDP-Glucosyltransferase UGT73AM3
Yang Zhong,Xiaofeng Xue,Zhiqiang Liu,Yongshuo Ma,Kewu Zeng,Lida Han,Jingjing Qi,Dae-Kyun Ro,Soren Bak,Sanwen Huang,Yuan Zhou,Yi Shang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2017.02.005
IF: 27.5
2017-01-01
Molecular Plant
Abstract:Plants have evolved great plasticity to adapt to external environments. A huge number of structurally diverse metabolites generated through the glycosylation process is one potential mechanism that contributes to this plasticity (Bowles et al., 2005Bowles D. Isayenkova J. Lim E.-K. Poppenberger B. Glycosyltransferases: managers of small molecules.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005; 8: 254-263Crossref PubMed Scopus (365) Google Scholar). Increased stability and water solubility of metabolites conferred by sugar conjugation play significant roles in various plant physiological functions, including detoxification of xenobiotics or harmful compounds, hormone homeostasis, defense against herbivores or pathogens, as well as compartmentalization and storage of metabolites (Bowles et al., 2005Bowles D. Isayenkova J. Lim E.-K. Poppenberger B. Glycosyltransferases: managers of small molecules.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005; 8: 254-263Crossref PubMed Scopus (365) Google Scholar, Gachon et al., 2005Gachon C.M. Langlois-Meurinne M. Saindrenan P. Plant secondary metabolism glycosyltransferases: the emerging functional analysis.Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10: 542-549Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). In plants, glycosylation reactions are usually catalyzed by enzymes from the ubiquitous UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT) gene family, which are capable of transferring a sugar moiety from an activated sugar donor to an acceptor (Bowles et al., 2005Bowles D. Isayenkova J. Lim E.-K. Poppenberger B. Glycosyltransferases: managers of small molecules.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005; 8: 254-263Crossref PubMed Scopus (365) Google Scholar). However, due to the large size of the plant UGT family and an increased number of new members identified from large-scale whole-genome sequencing, only a small fraction of UGTs have been functionally characterized. Cucurbitacins, a group of highly oxygenated tetracyclic triterpenoids, are extremely bitter compounds mainly present in Cucurbitaceae (Chen et al., 2005Chen J.C. Chiu M.H. Nie R.L. Cordell G.A. Qiu S.X. Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: structures and biological activities.Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 386-399Crossref PubMed Scopus (456) Google Scholar). Because of this unpleasant taste, cucurbitacins are widely adopted by cucurbit plants to ward off herbivores (Da Costa and Jones, 1971Da Costa C.P. Jones C.M. Cucumber beetle resistance and mite susceptibility controlled by the bitter gene in Cucumis sativus L.Science. 1971; 172: 1145-1146Crossref PubMed Scopus (117) Google Scholar). In addition, cucurbitacins also exhibit a wide range of pharmacological properties, such as strong anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activities (Chen et al., 2005Chen J.C. Chiu M.H. Nie R.L. Cordell G.A. Qiu S.X. Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: structures and biological activities.Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 386-399Crossref PubMed Scopus (456) Google Scholar). Unfortunately, the innate cytotoxicity of these compounds impedes their medical application (Chen et al., 2005Chen J.C. Chiu M.H. Nie R.L. Cordell G.A. Qiu S.X. Cucurbitacins and cucurbitane glycosides: structures and biological activities.Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005; 22: 386-399Crossref PubMed Scopus (456) Google Scholar). It is still unclear how cucurbit plants cope with this undesirable cytotoxicity of cucurbitacins while deploying these compounds as defensive agents against herbivores. In cucumber, the major bitter compound is cucurbitacin C (CuC). By applying integrated strategies, such as genome-wide association study (GWAS), RNA-seq, and metabolomics, we have identified nine CuC biosynthetic enzymes including a 2,3-oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC, Bi) responsible for the first committed step to generate the cucurbitane skeleton, and eight tailoring enzymes (seven cytochromes P450 and one acetyltransferase) that catalyze modifications of the skeleton to produce CuC (Shang et al., 2014Shang Y. Ma Y.S. Zhou Y. Zhang H.M. Duan L.X. Chen H.M. Zeng J.G. Zhou Q. Wang S.H. Gu W.J. et al.Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber.Science. 2014; 346: 1084-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar, Zhou et al., 2016Zhou Y. Ma Y.S. Zeng J.G. Duan L.X. Xue X.F. Wang H.S. Lin T. Liu Z.Q. Zeng K.W. Zhong Y. et al.Convergence and divergence of bitterness biosynthesis and regulation in cucumber, melon and watermelon.Nat. Plants. 2016; 2: 16183Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar). However, the involvement of a UGT in CuC metabolism has not been reported to our knowledge. Here, we isolated a putative glycosylated form of cucurbitacin C from 37 kg of leaves of the bitter cultivar 9930 (Supplemental Figure 1). Both 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data assigned by heteronuclear singular quantum correlation spectroscopy suggest this glycosylated compound should be a 3-O-glycoside of CuC (Supplemental Figures 2 and 3A, and Supplemental Table 1). This speculation was further confirmed by 1H-13C long-range correlation from the sugar anomeric proton (δH 4.90) to C-3 of the aglycon in the heteronuclear multiple bond correlation experiment (Supplemental Figure 3B). In addition, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the acid hydrolysis product of the CuC glycoside and the coupling constant of the anomeric proton (J = 8.0 Hz) indicated that the sugar unit is a β-D-glucoside (Supplemental Figure 4). The presence of glucosylated CuC in cucumber leaves strongly indicates the involvement of glucosylation in CuC metabolism (Figure 1A). Next, we tested whether this glucosylation process would alter the cytotoxicity of CuC by conducting 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays. Interestingly, high cytotoxicity of CuC was observed in vitro toward two cell lines as expected: HepG2 (human hepatoma, IC50 = 49.21 ± 1.10 μM) and A549 (human lung cancer, IC50 = 2.34 ± 0.51 μM), whereas this inhibitory effect was obviously reduced (IC50 > 100 μM) when the cells were treated with the same amount of CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside (Figure 1B and 1C). In contrast to human cells, no toxic effect of CuC and CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside was observed in root growth assays with cucumber, Arabidopsis, and tobacco seeds at 25 μM (data not shown). However, this negative result could not exclude the self-toxicity effect of CuC in planta, but may rather indicate a lack of net uptake of externally applied compound (due to active efflux) or detoxification by glycosylation also exists in plants not known to produce cucurbitacins. These hypotheses require further investigation. The UGT family is known to specifically catalyze O-glycosylation reactions (Gachon et al., 2005Gachon C.M. Langlois-Meurinne M. Saindrenan P. Plant secondary metabolism glycosyltransferases: the emerging functional analysis.Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10: 542-549Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). One hundred and seventeen UGTs have been annotated in the cucumber genome (Huang et al., 2009Huang S.W. Li R.Q. Zhang Z.H. Li L. Gu X.F. Fan W. Lucas W.J. Wang X.W. Xie B.Y. Ni P.X. et al.The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L.Nat. Genet. 2009; 41: 1275-1281Crossref PubMed Scopus (1078) Google Scholar), and our aim was to identify the UGT responsible for CuC-3-O-β-glucopyranoside biosynthesis based on the available genomic information. As reported in multiple cases (Augustin et al., 2012Augustin J.M. Drok S. Shinoda T. Sanmiya K. Nielsen J.K. Khakimov B. Olsen C.E. Hansen E.H. Kuzina V. Ekstrøm C.T. et al.UDP-glycosyltransferases from the UGT73C subfamily in Barbarea vulgaris catalyze sapogenin 3-O-glucosylation in saponin-mediated insect resistance.Plant Physiol. 2012; 160: 1881-1895Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar), functional UGTs are usually co-expressed with the enzymes involved in biosynthesis of the sugar acceptors (i.e., UGT acceptor substrates). Thus, RNA-seq data were searched for UGTs that co-expressed with Bi, the enzyme involved in the first committed step for CuC biosynthesis (Shang et al., 2014Shang Y. Ma Y.S. Zhou Y. Zhang H.M. Duan L.X. Chen H.M. Zeng J.G. Zhou Q. Wang S.H. Gu W.J. et al.Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber.Science. 2014; 346: 1084-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar). This identified three gene candidates: Csa6G366250 (UGT74AC2), Csa6G366270 (UGT74AJ2), and Csa4G279820 (UGT94T2) (Supplemental Figure 5 and Supplemental Table 2). Unfortunately, all three candidates failed to glycosylate CuC (data not shown). These results suggest that biosynthesis of CuC and glucosylation of CuC may occur at different developmental stages in the plant and that the candidate search strategy should be adjusted accordingly. In order to uncover the detailed accumulation pattern of CuC and CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside, 9930 leaves were sampled at various developmental stages, and the extracted metabolites were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for CuC and CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside. Intriguingly, CuC content slowly increased during the early development of leaves and then gradually decreased in the subsequent growth processes; for CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside, the content decline occurred at a slightly different stage when compared with that of CuC (Figure 1D). Thus, we repeated the RNA-seq analysis using the bitter leaves from six different developmental stages to narrow down the UGT candidates by correlating their expression patterns with the metabolic profile of CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside. Five UGTs (Csa3G744990 [UGT73AM3], Csa4G618520 [UGT71V2], Csa3G745010 [UGT73AT1], Csa7G051410 [UGT74AL1], and Csa6G109750 [UGT75V1]) were discovered in this analysis (Figure 1E, Supplemental Figure 6, and Supplemental Table 3). The phylogenetic analysis, including the five candidates and other reported plant UGTs, showed that UGT73AM3 and UGT73AT1 were clustered with members from the UGT73 family (Supplemental Figure 7 and Supplemental Table 4), which is well known for C3 mono-glycosylation activity toward triterpenoids (Augustin et al., 2012Augustin J.M. Drok S. Shinoda T. Sanmiya K. Nielsen J.K. Khakimov B. Olsen C.E. Hansen E.H. Kuzina V. Ekstrøm C.T. et al.UDP-glycosyltransferases from the UGT73C subfamily in Barbarea vulgaris catalyze sapogenin 3-O-glucosylation in saponin-mediated insect resistance.Plant Physiol. 2012; 160: 1881-1895Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar). In vitro glucosyltransferase assays were performed using CuC as sugar acceptor and UDP-glucose as sugar donor to test the catalytic ability of each candidate. As shown in the LC-MS analysis, UGT73AM3 specifically produced a peak with a retention time coinciding with that of authentic CuC 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside standard (Figure 1F). A detailed MS/MS analysis further confirmed the new metabolite to be CuC 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (Supplemental Figure 8). To further test the in vivo function of UGT73AM3, an Agrobacterium-mediated transient overexpression of this enzyme in the cotyledon of 9930 was done according to the procedures described previously (Shang et al., 2014Shang Y. Ma Y.S. Zhou Y. Zhang H.M. Duan L.X. Chen H.M. Zeng J.G. Zhou Q. Wang S.H. Gu W.J. et al.Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber.Science. 2014; 346: 1084-1088Crossref PubMed Scopus (286) Google Scholar). Four days after infiltration, an increased level of CuC 3-O-β-glucopyranoside was observed in the lines overexpressing UGT73AM3, whereas overexpression of other UGTs failed to alter the content of the target compound (Figure 1G). Based on these results, we concluded that UGT73AM3 is the CuC 3-O glucosyltransferase involved in the glucosylation of CuC in cucumber. Functional UGTs usually have a relatively wide range of sugar acceptor substrates when compared with other types of enzymes (Gachon et al., 2005Gachon C.M. Langlois-Meurinne M. Saindrenan P. Plant secondary metabolism glycosyltransferases: the emerging functional analysis.Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10: 542-549Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). To test the enzyme sugar acceptor promiscuity of UGT73AM3, other triterpenoids, including two other forms of cucurbitacins (cucurbitacin B [CuB] and E [CuE], the major bitter compound presents in melon and watermelon, respectively), ursolic acid, and oleanolic acid were used as potential sugar acceptors (Supplemental Figure 9A). Surprisingly, UGT73AM3 failed to glucosylate these triterpenoids, even though CuB and CuE share a substantial structural similarity to CuC (Supplemental Figure 9B), indicating that UGT73AM3 may possess a relative strict acceptor substrate preference. We further enlarged the range of sugar acceptor substrates to include flavonoids (naringenin and quercetin) and phenolic acids (coumalic acid and caffeic acid) (Supplemental Figure 10A). Interestingly, UGT73AM3 shows glucosylation ability toward naringenin but not to other compounds (Supplemental Figure 10B). In addition to sugar acceptor substrate specificity, affinity and catalytic efficacy are also important parameters to characterize UGTs. Thus, we measured the basic kinetic parameters of UGT73AM3 toward CuC and naringenin (Figure 1H). Interestingly, although the Km value of UGT73AM3 for CuC (9.3 μM) was ∼10-fold lower than for naringenin (82.6 μM), the kcat value of UGT73AM3 for CuC (5.33 × 10−5 s−1) was much lower than that for naringenin (2.28 × 10−2 s−1). However, an analysis of cucumber methanol extracts by LC-MS did not reveal the presence of naringenin glucosides in cucumber leaves (data not shown), and thus the activity toward naringenin appears to not reflect in planta activity. In general, co-expression analyses have been shown to be effective in identification of UGTs involved in the glycosylation processes. However, our initial candidate screen approach was deemed unsuccessful as the accumulation patterns of CuC and glucosylated CuC in planta were incoherent with each other (Figure 1D). This is the first clue that the potential physiological role of 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside may be different from triterpenoid saponins, which mainly serve as anti-feedants or protect plants against microbes and fungi (Augustin et al., 2012Augustin J.M. Drok S. Shinoda T. Sanmiya K. Nielsen J.K. Khakimov B. Olsen C.E. Hansen E.H. Kuzina V. Ekstrøm C.T. et al.UDP-glycosyltransferases from the UGT73C subfamily in Barbarea vulgaris catalyze sapogenin 3-O-glucosylation in saponin-mediated insect resistance.Plant Physiol. 2012; 160: 1881-1895Crossref PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar). Second, as shown in the MTT assays, CuC aglycone may display a much higher cytotoxicity than that of glucosylated CuC (Figure 1B and 1C). Thus, the plant could utilize the bitter and toxic CuC to avoid being ingested by insects or herbivores, especially in the early developmental stages prior to fruit maturation. It is well known that many plant defense compounds accumulate in a non-toxic state as glycosides that can be activated by de-glycosylation by β-glucosidases typically during tissue damage to release the more toxic aglycones (Pentzold et al., 2014Pentzold S. Zagrobelny M. Rook F. Bak S. How insects overcome two-component plant chemical defence: plant β-glucosidases as the main target for herbivore adaptation.Biol. Rev. 2014; 89: 531-551Crossref PubMed Scopus (100) Google Scholar). Once the fruits start to mature, the detoxification of CuC via glucosylation may serve to re-attract specialized herbivores to feed on the cucumber leaves or fruits in order to facilitate seed dispersion. Thus, this glycosylation reaction may represent a trade-off between plant reproductive strategies and defense mechanisms (Lucas-Barbosa, 2016Lucas-Barbosa D. Integrating studies on plant-pollinator and plant-herbivore interactions.Trends Plant Sci. 2016; 21: 125-133Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar). This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672171 to Y.S., 31401886 to Y.Z., 31322047 to Z.H.Z), the Leading Talents of Guangdong Province Program (00201515 to S.W.H), the National Key R & D Program for Crop Breeding (2016YFD0100506), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-IVFCAAS), the Chinese Ministry of Finance (1251610601001). This work was also supported by the Shenzhen Municipal and Dapeng District Governments.