Abstract:Driving is increasing across the world and road traffic accidents are a major cause of serious injuries and fatalities. The link between alcohol consumption and impaired driving has long been established and has led to legislation in many countries, with enforcement of legal limits based on blood alcohol concentration levels. Alcohol hangover research is an emerging field with a range of laboratory and naturalistic studies now clearly demonstrating the significant impairments that can result from hangover, even when alcohol levels are measured at or close to zero the day following a social drinking occasion. Driving is a commonplace activity but requires competency with a range of complex and potentially demanding tasks. Driving impaired can have serious consequences, including death and serious injury. There have been only limited alcohol hangover driving studies. The studies presented examined the consequences of alcohol hangover with a driving simulator contrasting a group with zero residual alcohol (N = 26) next day and another with residual alcohol (N = 26) assessed with breathalyzer in the morning before undertaking a 20 min commute to work. All participants completed a morning drive after a night without alcohol consumption and another after a night of social drinking. The driving scenarios were relatively demanding including traffic and pedestrians, traffic lights and other potential hazards in a mixed rural and urban journey. Subjective hangover and workload were assessed in addition to a range of driving performance variables, including divided attention, steering control and driving violations. Analyses contrasted driving in the no alcohol condition with the residual alcohol condition. The combined groups data (N = 52) was contrasted with the zero and residual alcohol groups. Significant contrasts were found for a range of driving measures, including divided attention, vehicle control, and driving violations as well as perceived workload. The pattern of impairment was broadly similar across both groups, indicating that whether or not residual alcohol was present, consistent driving impairment was seen. The relatively high number of significant variables may reflect the increased cognitive demand of the 20 min commute drive including busy and complex urban environments. This was also reflected in the significant increase in perceived workload recorded across the 6 dimensions of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Associations between subjective measures and driving performance with hangover suggested a potential lack of awareness of impairment, though were limited in number. The overall findings indicate that the levels of impairment seen reflect those seen with alcohol impaired driving, even when breath alcohol is zero.

Effect of different alcohol levels on take-over performance in conditionally automated driving

Drinking and driving: A systematic review of the impacts of alcohol consumption on manual and automated driving performance

Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving

The Impact of Alcohol Hangover on Simulated Driving Performance During a 'Commute to Work'-Zero and Residual Alcohol Effects Compared

Leveraging driver vehicle and environment interaction: Machine learning using driver monitoring cameras to detect drunk driving

Comparison of driving performance during the blood alcohol concentration ascending period and descending period under alcohol influence in a driving simulator

Understanding Take-over Performance of High Crash Risk Drivers During Conditionally Automated Driving

Study of the Effects of Alcohol on Drivers and Driving Performance on Straight Road

Effect of alcohol use on accelerating and braking behaviors of drivers

Effect of Similar Cognitive Secondary Tasks Under Different Levels on Takeover Performance within Various Time Windows for Transition Control from Automated to Manual Driving

Effects of non-driving related tasks on mental workload and take-over times during conditional automated driving

How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving

“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?

The Effect of Alcohol on the Physiological Performance of the Driver

Effects of Non-Driving Related Task Modalities on Takeover Performance in Highly Automated Driving

Drivers’ Performance in Non-critical Take-Overs From an Automated Driving System—An On-Road Study

Effect of cognitive load on drivers' State and task performance during automated driving: Introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control

Practical aspects of measuring camera‐based indicators of alcohol intoxication in manual and automated driving

Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

Influence of non-driving related tasks on driving performance after takeover transition in conditionally automated driving

Effects of non-driving related postures on takeover performance during conditionally automated driving