Just counting ten

Chenyu Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-024-01122-7
IF: 37.8
2024-02-28
Nature Catalysis
Abstract:By analysing the adsorption energies of common atomic adsorbates (for example, O, N, C, H) on various transition metal dopants in SAAs, the team discovered a correlation between the adsorption strength and the valence electron count of both adsorbate and dopant. In particular, they showed that the strongest binding corresponds to a total of ten valence electrons for hydrogen and twelve for p -block adsorbates (O, N, C). Assuming a metal dopant electronic structure resembling that of gas phase atoms, the team used an MO approach to gain an understanding of the population of orbitals involved in bonding and antibonding as well as their filling. This helped rationalize and unify the observed trends that hydrogen and p -block adsorbates follow, respectively. Their MO diagram indicates that adsorption is strongest when all bonding and nonbonding molecular orbitals with d contributions are filled. By excluding the non-constructive lone pair in the p -block case, they unified the trends and proposed a universal ten-electron rule for maximal binding. In extending the concept to molecular adsorbates, the ten-electron rule was found to mainly apply in cases where covalent interactions dominate. It is less suitable for cases like H 2 O and NH 3 , where electrostatic interactions are more significant. The practicality of the ten-electron rule was demonstrated by predicting active metal centres for accelerating the nitrogen to ammonia reduction process. In particular, the authors estimate the most effective dopants — d 7 metals like Re and Tc — for catalysing the rate-limiting step, that is the hydrogenation of N 2 to diazenyl NNH (pictured). The significance of this study extends beyond the discovery itself — it underscores the importance of developing simpler, less resource-demanding computational methodologies for understanding the origin of catalytic activity of SAAs.
chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?