What works in the field? A comparison of different interviewing methods in ethnobotany with special reference to the use of photographs

E. Thomas,I. Vandebroek,P. Damme
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[376:WWITFA]2.0.CO;2
2007-12-01
Economic Botany
Abstract:Ethnobotanists use a variety of interview techniques to collect ethnobotanical data. Drawing upon the results from a quantitative ethnobotanical study in five Yuracaré and Trinitario communities in the Bolivian Amazon, the pros and cons of the following methods are evaluated: (1) interviews in situ during transects, walk-in-the-woods, and homegarden sampling; and (2) interviews ex situ with fresh plant material, voucher specimens, or plant photographs as reference tools. Although the systematic use of plant photographs for ethnobotanical interviews is poorly documented in literature, the results show that indigenoùs participants in our study recognize significantly more plant species from photographs than from voucher specimens. It is argued that, especially in remote and isolated study sites, photographs might be advantageous over voucher specimens.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?