THE SPLIT LARYNGEAL MASK AND THE DIFFICULT AIRWAY

J. Brimacombe,A. Berry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1994.tb03989.x

1994-10-01

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract:We read with interest the report by Maroof et al. describing the successful use of a modified (split) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as an aid to fiberoptic tracheal intubation for nasal septoplasty (1). The split LMA, which was originally described in 1991 (2), has been shown to be a useful aid to fiberoptic intubation and facilitates the passage of a larger tracheal tube size, more usually with the LMA remaining in situ until after intubation is achieved (3-5). In fact, the split LMA is likely to be superseded by a dedicated intubating LMA with a short, large bore tube. The split LMA may be technically difficult to make, implying that intubation with a size 6 mm tracheal tube (TT) followed by the use of a tube changer may be equally as reliable, if the patient is stable. There is controversy about the use of the LMA for the anticipated difficult airway (6-8), with or without prior administration of muscle relaxants (9). It may be argued that the LMA should not be used in case the need for urgent intubation arises intra operatively and that it may be wholly inadequate in a substantial minority ofpatients. Certainly the LMA can often solve the problem of supraglottic anatomical abnormalities. There is indirect evidence that LMA insertion is not compromised in patients with difficult airways (10-13) and that there are fewer complications with the LMA than the TT. In data collected from over 9600 anatomically normal patients, Haden et al. found a significantly lower incidence of difficult placement and laryngospasm with the LMA than TT (0.9 v 3.4%) (14). Should urgent intubation be required, a fibreoptic intubation through the LMA is still a reasonable alternative at this point, and the presence of an LMA does not prevent direct tracheal access from the neck. However, we feel that there must still be concern that a patient with anticipated difficult intubation is anaesthetised and paralysed with a non-depolarising muscle relaxant before the airway is secured. It would be more appropriate to secure the airway using an awake technique prior to induction of anaesthesia, in which instance use of the split LMA would still have been a reasonable option. Finally, in experienced hands, the LMA is suitable for ENT procedures and has been shown to form a reliable throat pack in adults (15, 16). It has been used in nasal septoplasty (17) and adenotonsillectomy where it appears to have some advantages over the TT (18, 19). In one study of adenotonsillectomy, the LMA was exchanged for a TT in five of the first 15 patients and none of the last 40 patients suggesting a marked learning curve (19). A further modification of the LMA, the reinforced LMA, has been specifically designed for ENT and dental surgery to increase access to the head, neck and oral cavity and to allow the use of a tonsillar gag (20).