Comparing the risk of death, major adverse cardiac events, and relapse in bullous pemphigoid patients treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids
Khalaf Kridin,Katja Bieber,Artem Vorobyev,Eva Lotta Moderegger,Gema Hernandez,Enno Schmidt,Ralf J Ludwig
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae219
2024-05-27
Abstract:Background: According to current guidelines, systemic or topical corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatments for bullous pemphigoid (BP). There is evidence suggesting that topical application may be associated with a lower risk of mortality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive large-scale data comparing mortality rates, as well as the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), infections, and relapse, between systemic and topical corticosteroid treatments. Objectives: To evaluate the risk of death, MACE, infections, and relapse in BP patients treated with systemic or topical corticosteroids. Methods: A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed in the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. As a measure against bias, propensity-score matching for age, sex, ten diseases and six medications, and three sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: All-time risk of death was increased in US BP patients exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids (n=2,917) compared to topical clobetasol propionate treated patients (n=2,932, hazard ratio [HR], 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-1.58, p<0.0001). This was consistent in time-stratified analysis (1- and 3-year mortality rates), and in analysis contrasting prednisone (equivalent) does of 1-10 mg (low) or 30-100 mg (medium-high) systemic corticosteroid to topical treatment. The increased risk of death in US BP patients exposed to any dose of systemic corticosteroids compared to topical treatment was accompanied by increased risks for MACE (HR 1.33, CI 1.08-1.64, p=0.0075) and infections (HR 1.33, CI 1.15-1.54, p=0.0001). The risk of continued disease or relapse was decreased in patients treated with systemic as opposed to topical corticosteroid (HR 0.85, CI 0.77-0.94, p=0.0016). Results regarding mortality and continued disease or relapse persisted in three of three sensitivity analyses. Potential limitations are the retrospective data collection, bias for treatment selection and miscoding. Conclusion: Pending validation in prospective studies, where feasible, and despite the heightened risk of relapse, topical corticosteroid treatment may be advantageous compared to systemic corticosteroid treatment due to its significantly lower risk of death.