Validation of Home Visual Acuity Tests for Telehealth in the COVID-19 Era
Kellyn N. Bellsmith,Michael J. Gale,Sen Yang,Isabelle B. Nguyen,Christa J. Prentiss,Luan T. Nguyen,Sam Mershon,Allison I. Summers,Merina Thomas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0396
IF: 8.253
2022-03-31
JAMA Ophthalmology
Abstract:ImportanceVisual acuity (VA) is one of the most important clinical data points in ophthalmology. However, few options for validated at-home VA assessments are currently available.ObjectiveTo validate 3 at-home visual acuity tests in comparison with in-office visual acuity.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsBetween July 2020 and April 2021, eligible participants with VA of 20/200 or better were recruited from 4 university-based ophthalmology clinics (comprehensive, cornea, glaucoma, and retina clinics). Participants were prospectively randomized to self-administer 2 of 3 at-home VA tests (printed chart, mobile phone app, and website) within 3 days before their standard-of-care clinic visit. Participants completed a survey assessing usability of the at-home tests. At the clinic visit, best-corrected Snellen distance acuity was measured as the reference standard.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe at-home VA test results were compared with the in-office VA test results using paired and unpairedttests, Pearson correlation coefficients, analysis of variance, χ2tests, and Cohen κ agreement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each at-home test were calculated to detect significant VA changes (≥0.2 logMAR) from the in-office baseline.ResultsA total of 121 participants with a mean (SD) age of 63.8 (13.0) years completed the study. The mean in-office VA was 0.11 logMAR (Snellen equivalent 20/25) with similar numbers of participants from the 4 clinics. Mean difference (logMAR) between the at-home test and in-office acuity was −0.07 (95% CI, −0.10 to −0.04) for the printed chart, −0.12 (95% CI, −0.15 to −0.09) for the mobile phone app, and −0.13 (95% CI, −0.16 to −0.10) for the website test. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the printed chart was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79), mobile phone app was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.69), and website test was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.53-0.73).Conclusions and RelevanceThe 3 at-home VA test results (printed chart, mobile phone app, and website) appeared comparable within 1 line to in-office VA measurements. Older participants were more likely to have limited access to digital tools. Further development and validation of at-home VA testing modalities is needed with the expansion of teleophthalmology care.
medicine, general & internal