Outcomes of Presumed Aseptic Long-Bone Nonunions With Positive Intraoperative Cultures Through a Single-Stage Surgical Protocol

Diren Arsoy,Johanna C E Donders,Laura J Kleeblad,Andy O Miller,Michael W Henry,Davis S Wellman,David L Helfet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001084
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of a single-stage surgical protocol to treat a presumed aseptic long-bone nonunion with positive intraoperative cultures obtained at the time of surgery. Design: Retrospective comparative series. Setting: Orthopaedic specialty hospital. Patients and methods: We retrospectively identified 77 patients with long-bone nonunions thought to be aseptic preoperatively, which grew bacteria from cultures obtained at the time of index nonunion surgery. Intervention: Fifty (65%) patients underwent open debridement of the nonunion site followed by surgical stabilization through plates and screws. Twenty-seven (35%) patients underwent exchange nailing with canal reamings used for cultures. Main outcome measurement: Rate of radiographic union, time to clinical and radiographic union, nonunion rate after index nonunion surgery, and final union rate after revision procedures. Results: Osseous union after the index nonunion surgery was achieved in 84% of the patients (65 of 77). Time to clinical union was 6.3 months (range, 1-24 months), and time to radiographic union was 7.4 months (range, 2-24 months). Eighteen percent (14 of 77 patients) did not heal after the index nonunion surgery and required additional surgeries. The final union rate after revision surgery was 99% (76 of 77 patients). Conclusions: Eighty-four percent of presumed aseptic nonunions of long-bone fractures with positive intraoperative cultures fully healed after a single-stage surgical protocol and long-term antibiotic when appropriate. When patients are diagnosed with a subclinical infected nonunion, they should be counseled about the higher likelihood of reoperation, but in most cases can expect excellent union rates after 1 additional surgery. Level of evidence: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?