Abstract:Background The force generated by the Latissimus Dorsi contraction during adduction can be transmitted to the contralateral Gluteus Maximus, modifying hip resting position towards lateral rotation. It is suggested that this change is due to the connection of these muscles with the thoracolumbar fascia. However, it is not known whether the tensioning of the latissimus dorsi leads to a change in fascia stiffness. In addition, adduction may be less functional, making it necessary to evaluate whether the latissimus dorsi contraction in movements more present in activities of daily living and sports, such as, for example, shoulder extension, may also be capable of transmitting force to the Thoracolumbar Fascia and Gluteus Maximus. Objectives To compare lumbar stiffness and hip resting position between control and active tensioning of the Latissimus dorsi in shoulder extension conditions, providing evidence for a better understanding of the force transmission mechanism between Latissimus dorsi, Thoracolumbar fascia and Gluteus maximus. Methods 44 healthy individuals of both genders (age: 29.80±7.71 years, weight: 65.32±9.82 kg and height: 1.69±0.09 m) participated in this study. A portable instrument capable of recording passive tissue stiffness was used to assess lumbar stiffness. The hip resting position was calculated from the passive resistance torque, recorded with an isokinetic dynamometer during the medial rotation movement, while the electromyographic activity of the Latissimus Dorsi, Paraspinal and hip muscles was monitored. Both tests were performed under conditions of control and active tensioning of the Latissimus Dorsi, performed with the shoulder in 10° of extension, sustaining 10% of the participant's maximum RM. For statistical analysis, the Wilcoxon Test was used to compare the stiffness of the lumbar region and the Paired t-test was used to compare the resting position of the hip between the studied conditions. Results During active tensioning, an increase in lumbar stiffness was demonstrated compared to the control condition (Z=-5.54, p<0.001). The mean difference was -1.48±1.45 N/mm. For the resting position, a shift towards lateral hip rotation was demonstrated during active tensioning (t=5.303, p<0.001). The mean difference between conditions was 1.73±2.16°. Conclusion The findings of the present study demonstrated that the active tensioning of the Latissimus Dorsi in extension altered the passive properties of the hip and lumbar region, supporting the force transmission mechanism between the Latissimus Dorsi, Thoracolumbar Fascia and Gluteus Maximus. Although it was not possible to register the specific stiffness of the fascia, the lumbar evaluation was only performed in individuals who kept the paraspinals relaxed during tensioning, favoring changes in connective tissues to be better captured. For future studies, it is important to evaluate the relationship between the efficiency of force transmission and performance and the development of dysfunctions. Implications The myofascial force transmission between the Latissimus Dorsi, Thoracolumbar Fascia and Gluteus Maximus must be considered in the evaluation of muscle function, movement and dysfunction processes related to these regions. Support: CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG.

Anatomical Basis of the Myofascial Trigger Points of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle

Anatomical Bases of the Temporal Muscle Trigger Points

Anatomical Study of the Innervation of the Masseter Muscle and Its Correlation with Myofascial Trigger Points

Intramuscular Neural Distribution of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle: Diagnostic Electromyography and Injective Treatments

On a potential morpho-mechanical link between the gluteus maximus muscle and pelvic floor tissues

MYOFASCIAL FORCE TRANSMISSION BETWEEN LATISSIMUS DORSI, THORACOLUMBAR FASCIA AND GLUTEUS MAXIMUS: NEW EVIDENCE FOR UNDERSTANDING THIS PHENOMENON

Expression and significance of a alpha-smooth muscular actin in the gluteal muscle contracture

Myofascial trigger point (MTrP) size and elasticity properties can be used to differentiate characteristics of MTrPs in lower back skeletal muscle

The pathophysiological nature of sarcomeres in trigger points in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: A preliminary study

Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle

Association between myofascial trigger point therapy and conditioned pain modulation

Guidance to trigger point injection for treating myofascial pain syndrome: Intramuscular neural distribution of the quadratus lumborum

Revisiting the Middle Cluneal Nerves: An Anatomic Study with Application to Pain Syndromes and Invasive Procedures Around the Sacrum

Anatomical analysis of the motor endplate zones of the suprascapular nerve to the infraspinatus muscle and its clinical significance in managing pain disorder

Intramuscular innervation of the tensor fasciae latae: Application to total hip arthroplasty

Left Gluteal Maximus Neuroma Causing Long-Standing Gluteal Pain

Autonomic nerve regulation in joint hypermobility patients with myofascial trigger points by Musculoskeletal Interfiber Counterirritant Stimulation (MICS)

Detailed spatial characterization of superficial hip muscle activation during walking: A multi-electrode surface EMG investigation of the gluteal region in healthy older adults

Correlations between the Frankfort Plane and the Presence of Myofascial Trigger Points in Posterior Cervical Musculature: An Exploratory Study

Anatomical Relationships of the Sciatic Nerve and Pudendal Nerve to the Ischial Spine as they Exit the Greater Sciatic Foramen

Essence of acupoints and meridians based on the studies of myofascial trigger points