Association of Plasma Vitamin D Metabolites with Incident Type 2 Diabetes: EPIC-InterAct Case-Cohort Study
Ju-Sheng Zheng,Fumiaki Imamura,Stephen J. Sharp,Yvonne T. van der Schouw,Ivonne Sluijs,Thomas E. Gundersen,Eva Ardanaz,Heiner Boeing,Catalina Bonet,Jesus Humberto Gomez,Courtney Dow,Guy Fagherazzi,Paul W. Franks,Mazda Jenab,Tilman Kuehn,Rudolf Kaaks,Timothy J. Key,Kay-Tee Khaw,Cristina Lasheras,Olatz Mokoroa,Francesca Romana Mancini,Peter M. Nilsson,Kim Overvad,Salvatore Panico,Domenico Palli,Olov Rolandsson,Sabina Sieri,Elena Salamanca-Fernandez,Carlotta Sacerdote,Annemieke M. W. Spijkerman,Magdalena Stepien,Anne Tjonneland,Rosario Tumino,Adam S. Butterworth,Elio Riboli,John Danesh,Claudia Langenberg,Nita G. Forouhi,Nicholas J. Wareham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01522
2018-01-01
Abstract:Background: Existing evidence for the prospective association of vitamin D status with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is focused almost exclusively on circulating total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] without distinction between its subtypes: nonepimeric and epimeric 25(OH)D-3 stereoisomers, and 25(OH)D-2, the minor component of 25(OH)D. We aimed to investigate the prospective associations of circulating levels of the sum and each of these three metabolites with incident T2D. Methods: This analysis in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-InterAct case-cohort study for T2D included 9671 incident T2D cases and 13,562 subcohort members. Plasma vitamin D metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. We used a multivariable Prentice-weighted Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of T2D for each metabolite. Analyses were performed separately within country, and estimates were combined across countries using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: The mean concentrations (SD) of total 25(OH)D, nonepimeric 25(OH)D-3, epimeric 25(OH)D-3, and 25(OH)D-2 were 41.1 (17.2), 40.7 (17.3), 2.13 (1.31), and 8.16 (6.52) nmol/L, respectively. Plasma total 25(OH)D and nonepimeric 25(OH)D-3 were inversely associated with incident T2D [multivariable-adjusted HR per 1 SD = 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77, 0.86) for both variables], whereas epimeric 25(OH)D-3 was positively associated [per 1 SD HR = 1.16 (1.09, 1.25)]. There was no statistically significant association with T2D for 25(OH)D-2 [per 1 SD HR = 0.94 (0.76, 1.18)]. Conclusions: Plasma nonepimeric 25(OH)D-3 was inversely associated with incident T2D, consistent with it being the major metabolite contributing to total 25(OH)D. The positive association of the epimeric form of 25(OH)D-3 with incident T2D provides novel information to assess the biological relevance of vitamin D epimerization and vitamin D subtypes in diabetes etiology.