Abstract:Abstract Background To achieve the proper sagittal alignment, previous studies have developed different assessment systems for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) which could help the spine surgeon in making treatment strategies. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether Roussouly classification or global alignment and proportion (GAP) score is more appropriate in the prediction of mechanical complications after surgical treatment of ADS. Methods ADS patients who received long segmental fusion in the treatment during the period from December 2016 to December 2018 were evaluated in this study. Basic information and radiologic measurements were collected for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to occurrence or absence of mechanical complications for comparison. Mechanical complications included proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF). GAP categories divided GAP score into proportioned spinopelvic position, moderately disproportioned position, and severely disproportioned position according to the cut-off values. The correlation between evaluation systems and mechanical complications was analyzed through a logistic regression model via stepwise backward elimination based on the Wald statistics. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the predictability of the evaluation systems in the occurrence of mechanical complications and calculate their cut-off value. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the validity of the thresholds. Results A total of 80 patients were included in this study. There were 41 patients in mechanical complication group and 39 patients in no mechanical complication group. GAP score ( P = 0.008) and GAP categories ( P = 0.007) were positively correlated with mechanical complications; Roussouly score was negatively correlated with mechanical complications ( P = 0.034); GAP score was positively correlated with PJK ( P = 0.021); Roussouly score was negatively correlated with implant-related complications ( P = 0.018); GAP categories were correlated with implant loosening ( P = 0.023). Results of ROC showed that GAP score was more effective in predicting PJK (AUC = 0.863) and PJF (AUC = 0.724) than Roussouly score; GAP categories (AUC = 0.561) was more effective than GAP score (AUC = 0.555) in predicting implant-related complications. Conclusions Roussouly classification could only be a rough estimate of optimal spinopelvic alignment. Quantitative parameters in GAP score made it more effective in predicting mechanical complications, PJK and PJF than Roussouly classification.

Feasibility of a Modified E-PASS and POSSUM System for Postoperative Risk Assessment in Patients with Spinal Disease

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) Model As a Predictor of Postoperative Complications and Mortality after Digestive Surgeries: a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress scoring system for predicting complications following abdominal surgery: A meta-analysis spanning 2004 to 2022

Predictive Value of the POSSUM, P-Possum, Cr-Possum, APACHE II and ACPGBI Scoring Systems in Colorectal Cancer Resection

Value of Orthopedic POSSUM and P-POSSUM Scoring System in Predicting Operation Risk in Aged Patients with Hip Fracture

Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress As a Prediction Scoring System for Colonic Surgery

Application of POSSUM and P-POSSUM in Surgical Risk Assessment of Elderly Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery

A scoring system to predict postoperative medical complications in high-risk patients undergoing elective thoracic and lumbar arthrodesis

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Surgical risk assessment among elderly emergency patients: a report of 146 cases

A systematic review of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity and its Portsmouth modification as predictors of post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

Surgical decision making of elderly patients aged over 70 years(246 cases)

[Prevention Strategy of Post-Operative Complications in Elderly Patients with Colorectal Cancer Based on Scoring Systems].

Comparison of three predictive scoring systems for morbidity in oncological spine surgery

Application of Modified POSSUM in Predicting the Incidence of Complications for Patients Receiving Cervical Spine Surgery

Risk audit of elderly patients aged over 60 undergoing emergency operations

[The POSSUM scoring system for risks assessment in pancreatoduodenectomy].

Evaluation of E-PASS system to predict postoperative complications risk in stomach tumors surgery

Usefulness of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) System for Prediction of Complication and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients after Hepatectomy.

The Establishment of a Predictive Model for Major Postoperative Complications in Spine Deformity Surgery and Evaluation of Its Clinical Application

Surgical decision making of elderly patients aged over 75 years——133 cases report