Randomized cross-over trial comparing the diagnosis of gestational diabetes by oral glucose tolerance test and a designed breakfast glucose profile

Colin Marais,David R Hall,Lourentia van Wyk,Magda Conradie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12427
Abstract:Objective: To compare a glucose test based on a standardized, designed breakfast to the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), comparing venous and capillary glucose values for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: The present prospective, randomized, cross-over trial enrolled patients at high risk of developing GDM who were attending the High-Risk Antenatal Clinic of Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, between March 1 and December 31, 2015. Patients were randomized to initial testing with either the OGTT or a designed breakfast glucose profile (DBGP) glucose test before the alternate test was performed 1 week later; no dietary or other interventions were applied in the intervening period. Venous and capillary fasting and 2-hour glucose values were measured and were compared between the OGTT and DBGP, and between OGTT and laboratory venous samples. Results: There were 51 patients included in the study. The fasting and 2-hour capillary glucose values from the OGTT correlated significantly with the laboratory venous samples (P<0.001 at both time intervals). The 2-hour capillary glucose values from the DBGP demonstrated a satisfactory correlation with those from the OGTT (P<0.001). Conclusions: The DBGP provided a sufficiently accurate alternate test for the diagnosis of GDM; it warrants further investigation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?