Ondansetron oral spray (Zensana) versus ondansetron oral tablets in a randomized, bioavailability study in adult subjects.

W. Yates,G. Berk,M. Wolter,S. Nino,S. Kollipara,R. Chavira,J. Kisicki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.24.18_SUPPL.8622
IF: 45.3
2006-06-20
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:8622 Background: Zensana ondansetron oral spray (ZSN) is the first oral spray 5-HT3 antagonist to deliver ondansetron, the most commonly prescribed anti-emetic for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) through the oral cavity. ZSN achieves therapeutic drug levels by delivering small droplets of concentrated drug solution over the oral mucosa, which has a rich blood supply and has been shown to be an alternative drug delivery route. ZSN may offer certain advantages to patients experiencing CINV who have difficulty swallowing and holding down pills. METHODS This was a randomized, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study where ZSN, administered as 4mg, 8mg, 12mg, and 8mg with a 30-sec hold before swallowing was evaluated in healthy subjects against an 8mg ondasetron (Zofran [ZFR]) tablet (reference). Treatments were separated by 48 hrs. PK samples were measured during the 24 hrs after dosing and were assayed using LC/MS/MS techniques. PK parameters were analyzed using a cross-over ANOVA model. Two treatments were concluded bioequivalent if the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios for ln-transformed Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf fell between the FDA guideline of 80% to 125%. RESULTS Thirty-two subjects (17 women, 15 men) received each of the 5 treatments, except for one man who did not receive the 12mg dose. The geometric mean ratios and the 90% CI for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf respectively, for each pair of treatments were as follows: ZSN 4mg vs 8mg tablet (TAB): 41%(39-43%); 45%(43-47%), and 47%(45-49%); ZSN 8mg vs 8mg TAB: 87%(83-91%), 98%(94-102%), and 99%(94-103%); ZSN 12mg vs 8mg TAB: 145%(138-152%), 157%(150-164%), and 157%(150-164%); and ZSN 8mg with a 30 sec hold vs 8mg TAB: 86%(82-90%), 99%(94-103%), and 99%(95-104%). There were no serious or unexpected adverse events (AE) and the safety profile was similar across all treatments. The most commonly reported AEs were constipation (11/32[34%]), headache (10/32[31%]), and dizziness (5/32[16%]) which were mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS ZSN 8mg falls within the FDA criteria for bioequivalence, and is bioequivalent to an 8mg ZFR tablet. ZSN 4, 8, or 12mg has a similar safety profile as a ZFR 8 mg tablet. [Table: see text].
What problem does this paper attempt to address?