Prevention and management of fraud—in theory

P. Riis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01043.x
1994-02-01
Journal of Internal Medicine
Abstract:Fraud in medical science is a reality. Hence theories and concepts arise out of analyses of real cases, and come only secondarily from on-going research topics into consistent handling of fraudulent activities and general prevention. For 5 to 6 decennia, medical science-especially clinical research-has focused on a much needed upgrading of scientists’ knowledge and their experience in methodology. Examples include the art of planning, carrying through, and interpreting a study, with special emphasis on the basic demands of medical research, based on principles derived from the natural sciences : clarity, reproducibility, and projective universality. To meet these demands medical researchers have had to adopt skills in logic, statistics, diagnostic taxonomy and decision-theories. With this background, medical science has taken a major leap forwards, as reflected in much better journal publications and an abundance of P-values. So far, so good. Nevertheless, a high methodological standard is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for securing the reliability of scientific results. It is important to introduce ‘the moral P-value’, i.e. the possibility that a given study is not in accordance with prevalent ethics, moral values, norms and attitudes. Consequently, one leaves the world of measurable, managable conditions and moves into the world of existential concepts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?