Outcomes of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock undergoing heart transplantation
V Bellini,D Fatori,F G De Mateo,G J F Loureiro,M F Macatrao,C Bernoche,L Kopel,S G Lage
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1112
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is generally used as a short-term device to maintain adequate organ perfusion in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, whether IABP improves clinical outcomes as a bridge therapy for heart transplant (HTx) remains controversial. Purpose Evaluate the survival rate 30 days after heart transplant (HTx) in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) and CS using IABP pre transplant compared to non-IABP group. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with advanced HF and CS, admitted in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary university center, between 2009 and 2020, who underwent HTx. Study group included patients submitted to IABP implantation before HTx, and a non-IABP group submitted to HTx without left ventricular mechanical support. Propensity Score Matching was used to pair the groups according to relevant clinical covariates. The primary outcome of survival rate 30 days after HTx was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results 326 were enrolled, 199 in IABP group and 127 in non-IABP group. For non-IABP and IABP group, respectively, the most frequent etiology was Chagas disease (29,9% and 47,2%, p=0,006) followed by idiopathic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy, the majority of patients were male (63% and 61,3%, p=0,760), the mean age was 46,9 ± 14,4 and 46,5 ± 12 years (p=0,791) and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 25,9 ± 9,5% and 23,5 ± 5,9% (p=0,010). The Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) at ICU admission was compared in both groups, which was 36,8% ± 17,8% in non-IABP group and 32,6% ± 18,6% in IABP group (p=0,042). At 30 days after HTx, there was no statistical difference in overall survival (p=0,459) between the groups (IABP: 18,1% mortality; non-IABP: 14,2% mortality). Survival rate after HTx was also similar in patients with Chagas disease compared to the other etiologies in both study groups (IABP group: p=0,221; non-IABP group: p=0,421). Conclusion In patients with advanced HF and CS submitted to HTx, the survival rate 30 days after HTx was equivalent in the IABP and non-IABP groups. In patients with Chagas disease the survival was also similar compared to other etiologies in both groups.Characteristics according to groupsKaplan-Meier survival estimates
cardiac & cardiovascular systems