Classification of primary tumors of bone

L. Lichtenstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(195103)4:2<335::AID-CNCR2820040219>3.0.CO;2-9

IF: 6.9209

1951-03-01

Cancer

Abstract:A S O U R knowledge in regard to the piiniory tumors of boiie has advanced, within the p i s t decade p‘irticularly, the inadequacy of tlic‘ classific‘ition ok bone tumois 01 the Rcgistry ot Bone Sarcoma as modified Ewingi in 1939, has become increasingly e (lent. Attempts a t its partial re\ision by Biidd anti MacDonalrl, and by Wheelock, Colcy, aiid I A C k, among others, hare been directed iriaiiily toward siinplifying it b y eliininatiiig 1 ar ious tiiinor “scries” of dubious signihcance and rendering i t iiioic complete 11) inclutlirig ‘i nunibci of tlistinc t i \ c neoplasiiis peculiar t o bone not piel iouslj listed. Soiiic othei lists of lmne tuiiiors that h a \ c been set foith, c.g., thow ot Hatcher and of IVillis, appear basitall) ~ o u n t l so far as they go, but, ag,iin, tlieii usefulness is limited b y lack of colnpletcncsi. $ t i l l another proposed classification, that 01 GcscIiitkter ant l Copeland, is pi etlicatcd upon Iiigshl) in&\ itlualistic theoi ies of enibr) ologita l development, which hardly afford a i;itional Ins i s for discussion aiid which, i n any c ~ e n t , a i c likelj to prole more conrusing than Iielplitl t o those not fu l ly conleisant with the subject. For soiiic reason oi other, also, these authors ha\e seen fit to include in their cla55ification a nuniber ot lesions u h i t h are ob\. iously not neoplastic. Altogether, thc writer has felt iiiipclled to (lei isc his own classification of tuiiioi s arising in bone, along vxming1) IogicaI histogenetic lines. T h i s classification, reflecting curient conccyts, 1 n o ~ ides within its framewoik a place T o i ,111 known priiiiai-y neoplcimis o f I,oric iiitlutling thosc iecently dclineatccl as ~);ithological cnt itics, with the exccptioii only or the otlontogenic tiinioi-s antl the toinparali\ely iincotiiiiion tiiiiioi s arising fi oin the pei iostcuni, wliose biologic a1 beha\ ioi sets thcin apart as a group un to thcmselves. It includes the Ixriign as well as the malignant piimai 1 tuniois. An ‘itte~npi has also been made to indicate the inalignant tountcrpai t (if an)) 01 each ol the benign tiumois listed, aiitl, after tlic niannei ot a peiiodic table, to reserlc a place for s u c h specific malignant tuirioi s as inaj bc liitliei to uniecorded, in the e l cnt that they a le obscr\ ctl antl I ecogni7cd in the flitrile. Except f o r this procision, the scheme has been iiiade as streamlined as possible in the intcicst of tlarit) and concisencss antl licts only neoplastic entities that h a w lxen clescri1)cd a s s u ( 11 01 that can be readily itlcntified on pathological exmiinat ion, if oiic is familiar with tliein. 7 o be sure, i t reflcc t5 the wiitei’s pcisoncil xicws, antl i n soine lew debatable instances (c g , Ewing’s saicoma ai il) cnt,iils a i l i i t i a iy clccisions as to liistogeiictic oiigin. Be tli‘it as i t may, t h i s classification is picsentecl foi considcralion ‘is a helpful WOI king 11) pothcsis, along with pei tinent coniriierit in support of the p i oposecl categories.