Abstract:BACKGROUND CONTEXT In the United States, one of the more commonly performed elective spine surgical procedures is lumbar discectomy for treatment of disc herniation in patients experiencing back or leg pain that is unresponsive to conservative treatment. The general age of the US population is rising with an expected increase in the frequency of surgical interventions for age-related spine conditions Studies have shown that older patients demonstrate recurrence of herniations earlier while younger patients have lower rates of reoperation for herniations. PURPOSE This purpose of this study is to understand the impact of age on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy to better manage patient selection for physicians and expectations regarding post-surgical recovery for patients. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study is a retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE A single spine surgeon's records were searched to identify patients who underwent primary lumbar discectomy. Eligible patients did not undergo treatment for malignancy, trauma, or infection, and had recorded PROMs. In total, 1,144 patients were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and perioperative traits such as herniated disc diagnosis, spinal pathologies, number of discectomy levels, operative time, blood loss volume, postoperative stay duration, pain, and narcotic use. Collected PROMs were Visual Analog Scale-back and leg pain (VAS-Back, VAS-L), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical function scores including PROMIS-Physical Function, Veteran Rands 12-Item Form Physical Composite Score (VR-12 PCS) and Short Form 12-Item Physical Function domain (SF-12 PCS). METHODS Included patients underwent surgery from December 2005 to April 2023. Patients were divided by age into four categories: Age I (25-35 years), Age II (35-45), Age III (45-55), and Age IV (+55). Demographic and perioperative data were extracted and compared using chi-square tests (categorical variables) or independent samples t-test (continuous variables). PROMs were compared using chi-squared and ANOVA analysis. Post-hoc testing was conducted using Tukey tests. RESULTS Preoperatively, no significant intercohort differences existed. At the 6-week follow-up, intercohort VAS-Back scores (p=0.048) and SF-12 PCS scores (p=0.030) were different, and by the final follow-up, a significant difference was seen in PROMIS-PF scores (p=0.028). Significant differences in MCID achievement rates occurred in VR-12 PCS (p=0.026), SF-12 PCS (p=0.002), PROMIS-PF (p<0.001), and VAS-Back (p<0.001), with Age I exhibiting overall higher MCID achievement rates. Post-hoc Tukey test revealed significant MCID achievement rates for VAS-B were between Age II and Age III (p=0.40), and significant for PROMIS-PF between Age I and Age III (p=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Our study underscores the role of age in determining the outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy, a procedure likely to increase in frequency in the coming decades. Notably, our research ventured beyond the traditional elderly-versus-younger categorizations common in previous studies by highlighting significant variations in PROMs and MCID achievement rates across more finely-stratified age groups. PROMs distinctions emerged at 6-week and final postoperative follow-ups for back pain and physical function. The 25-35 age group demonstrated higher MCID achievement rates. This nuanced approach reveals that age-related influences on recovery extend beyond just the elderly population, presenting information to better guide patient selection and counseling in the realm of spine surgery. FDA Device/Drug Status This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Surgery for Herniated Lumbar Disc in Daily Tobacco Smokers: A Multicenter Observational Study

Comparison of Outcomes Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The impact of smoking on patient-reported outcomes following lumbar decompression: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

Early outcomes of surgical treatment with microdiscectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and microdiscectomy: a follow-up exceeding five years

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing one- and two-level minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy

Comparing Quality of Life: Discectomy Surgery versus Epidural Corticosteroid Injection for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Impact of Tobacco Smoking on Outcomes After Posterior Decompression Surgery in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study

281 Does Smoking Status Affect Achievement of Satisfaction and Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Outcomes in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy at 24 Months? A QOD Study

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Matched Comparison Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Its Related Risk Factors and Disability Following Lumbar Discectomy: A Single-Center Study

Predictive Factors for Outcomes Following Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Lumbar degeneration and quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a case-control long-term follow-up study

P241. Comparison of age differences in clinical outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy

The Potential Negative Effects of Smoking on Cervical and Lumbar Surgery Beyond Pseudarthrosis: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative Study

Long-Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Long-term Outcome of Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery and Its Associated Factors

Inferior long-term outcomes after surgery for lumbar disc herniation in patients with prior lumbar spine surgery

Open fenestration discectomy versus microscopic fenestration discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial

Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation