Abstract:Background Although high-throughput genotyping arrays have made whole-genome association studies (WGAS) feasible, only a small proportion of SNPs in the human genome are actually surveyed in such studies. In addition, various SNP arrays assay different sets of SNPs, which leads to challenges in comparing results and merging data for meta-analyses. Genome-wide imputation of untyped markers allows us to address these issues in a direct fashion. Methods 384 Caucasian American liver donors were genotyped using Illumina 650Y (Ilmn650Y) arrays, from which we also derived genotypes from the Ilmn317K array. On these data, we compared two imputation methods: MACH and BEAGLE. We imputed 2.5 million HapMap Release22 SNPs, and conducted GWAS on ~40,000 liver mRNA expression traits (eQTL analysis). In addition, 200 Caucasian American and 200 African American subjects were genotyped using the Affymetrix 500 K array plus a custom 164 K fill-in chip. We then imputed the HapMap SNPs and quantified the accuracy by randomly masking observed SNPs. Results MACH and BEAGLE perform similarly with respect to imputation accuracy. The Ilmn650Y results in excellent imputation performance, and it outperforms Affx500K or Ilmn317K sets. For Caucasian Americans, 90% of the HapMap SNPs were imputed at 98% accuracy. As expected, imputation of poorly tagged SNPs (untyped SNPs in weak LD with typed markers) was not as successful. It was more challenging to impute genotypes in the African American population, given (1) shorter LD blocks and (2) admixture with Caucasian populations in this population. To address issue (2), we pooled HapMap CEU and YRI data as an imputation reference set, which greatly improved overall performance. The approximate 40,000 phenotypes scored in these populations provide a path to determine empirically how the power to detect associations is affected by the imputation procedures. That is, at a fixed false discovery rate, the number of cis-eQTL discoveries detected by various methods can be interpreted as their relative statistical power in the GWAS. In this study, we find that imputation offer modest additional power (by 4%) on top of either Ilmn317K or Ilmn650Y, much less than the power gain from Ilmn317K to Ilmn650Y (13%). Conclusion Current algorithms can accurately impute genotypes for untyped markers, which enables researchers to pool data between studies conducted using different SNP sets. While genotyping itself results in a small error rate (e.g. 0.5%), imputing genotypes is surprisingly accurate. We found that dense marker sets (e.g. Ilmn650Y) outperform sparser ones (e.g. Ilmn317K) in terms of imputation yield and accuracy. We also noticed it was harder to impute genotypes for African American samples, partially due to population admixture, although using a pooled reference boosts performance. Interestingly, GWAS carried out using imputed genotypes only slightly increased power on top of assayed SNPs. The reason is likely due to adding more markers via imputation only results in modest gain in genetic coverage, but worsens the multiple testing penalties. Furthermore, cis-eQTL mapping using dense SNP set derived from imputation achieves great resolution, and locate associate peak closer to causal variants than conventional approach.

Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies

A comparative analysis of cell-type adjustment methods for epigenome-wide association studies based on simulated and real data sets

pwrEWAS: a user-friendly tool for comprehensive power estimation for epigenome wide association studies (EWAS)

A Comparative Study of Five Association Tests Based on CpG Set for Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.

Improved filtering of DNA methylation microarray data by detection p values and its impact on downstream analyses

Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data

Abstract P390: E-value over P-value and Its Adjustments: Improving Dna Methylation Analysis with an Application to Hypertension Studies

Wemics: A Single‐Base Resolution Methylation Quantification Method for Enhanced Prediction of Epigenetic Regulation

Guidance for the design and analysis of cell-type specific epigenetic epidemiology studies.

Accurate estimation of SNP genotypes and genetic relatedness from DNA methylation data

Epigenome-wide association study of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of five prospective European cohorts

MethylGenotyper: Accurate Estimation of SNP Genotypes and Genetic Relatedness from DNA Methylation Data

NEpiC: a Network-Assisted Algorithm for Epigenetic Studies Using Mean and Variance Combined Signals.

Ebgsea: An Improved Gene Set Enrichment Analysis Method For Epigenome-Wide-Association Studies

Addressing Population-Specific Multiple Testing Burdens in Genetic Association Studies.

GWAS significance thresholds for deep phenotyping studies can depend upon minor allele frequencies and sample size

Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies

GWAS significance thresholds in large cohorts

Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets

Revisiting the genome-wide significance threshold for common variant GWAS

Critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC v1.0 BeadChip microarrays