Unilateral Extraterritorial Sanctions: The Search for a Jurisdictional Justification under International Law

Anna Sophie Nagel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.478

2023-03-13

Abstract:The US and the EU, amongst other nations, responded to the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 with a coordinated series of unprecedented sanctions. Expanding upon previous practice, the US sanctions package in particular contained several restrictive measures with extraterritorial application. This article examines the legality of unilateral extraterritorial sanctions imposed by the US, both historically and currently, by reference to the customary international law on state jurisdiction. It is argued that unilateral extraterritorial sanctions exceed the scope of the traditional jurisdictional grounds of territory, nationality, and security. In order to legitimise the current sanctions regime against Russia, which requires at least limited extraterritoriality to be effective, two novel bases of jurisdiction are proposed: reasonableness and anti-evasion. Whilst reasonableness must be rejected as a free-standing jurisdictional principle because of the ambiguity and subjectivity in its application to state practice, anti-evasion should be recognised as creating jurisdiction over conduct designed to circumvent otherwise lawful sanctions.

Political Science,Law