Potential of 14C-based vs. ΔCO-based ΔffCO2 observations to estimate urban fossil fuel CO2 (ffCO2) emissions

Fabian Maier,Christian Rödenbeck,Ingeborg Levin,Christoph Gerbig,Maksym Gachkivskyi,Samuel Hammer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8183-2024
IF: 6.3
2024-07-20
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Abstract:Atmospheric transport inversions are a powerful tool for independently estimating surface CO 2 fluxes from atmospheric CO 2 concentration measurements. However, additional tracers are needed to separate the fossil fuel CO 2 (ffCO 2 ) emissions from non-fossil CO 2 fluxes. In this study, we focus on radiocarbon ( 14 C), the most direct tracer of ffCO 2 , and the continuously measured surrogate tracer carbon monoxide (CO), which is co-emitted with ffCO 2 during incomplete combustion. In the companion paper by Maier et al. (2024), we determined discrete 14 C-based and continuous Δ CO-based estimates of the ffCO 2 excess concentration ( Δ ffCO 2 ) compared with a clean-air reference for the urban Heidelberg observation site in southwestern Germany. The Δ CO-based Δ ffCO 2 concentration was calculated by dividing the continuously measured Δ CO excess concentration by an average 14 C-based ΔCO/ΔffCO2 ratio. Here, we use the CarboScope inversion framework adapted for the urban domain around Heidelberg to assess the potential of both types of Δ ffCO 2 observations to investigate ffCO 2 emissions and their seasonal cycle. We find that, although they are more precise, 14 C-based Δ ffCO 2 observations from almost 100 afternoon flask samples collected in the 2 years of 2019 and 2020 are not well suited for estimating robust ffCO 2 emissions in the main footprint of this urban area, which has a very heterogeneous distribution of sources including several point sources. The benefit of the continuous Δ CO-based Δ ffCO 2 estimates is that they can be averaged to reduce the impact of individual hours with an inadequate model performance. We show that the weekly averaged Δ CO-based Δ ffCO 2 observations allow for a robust reconstruction of the seasonal cycle of the area source ffCO 2 emissions from temporally flat a priori emissions. In particular, the distinct COVID-19 signal – with a steep drop in emissions in spring 2020 – is clearly present in these data-driven a posteriori results. Moreover, our top-down results show a shift in the seasonality of the area source ffCO 2 emissions around Heidelberg in 2019 compared with the bottom-up estimates from the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO). This highlights the huge potential of Δ CO-based Δ ffCO 2 to validate bottom-up ffCO 2 emissions at urban stations if the ΔCO/ΔffCO2 ratios can be determined without biases.
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?