Colorectal Cancer Patients' Reported Frequency, Content, and Satisfaction with Advance Care Planning Discussions
Said Hussein,Chloe Ahryung Lim,Thulasie Manokaran,Shireen Kassam,Madalene Earp,Patricia A. Tang,Safiya Karim,Patricia Biondo,Sharon M. Watanabe,Aynharan Sinnarajah,Amy Tan,Jessica Simon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31030092
2024-02-26
Current Oncology
Abstract:(1) Background: This observational cohort study describes the frequency, content, and satisfaction of advance care planning (ACP) conversations with healthcare providers (HCPs), as reported by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. (2) Methods: The patients were recruited from two tertiary cancer centers in Alberta, Canada. Using the My Conversations survey with previously validated questions, the patients were asked about specific ACP elements discussed, with which HCPs these elements were discussed, their satisfaction with these conversations, and whether they had a goals of care designation (GCD) order. We surveyed and analyzed data from the following four time points: enrollment, months 1, 2, and 3. (3) Results: In total, 131 patients were recruited. At enrollment, 24% of patients reported discussing at least one ACP topic. From enrollment to month 3, patients reported a high frequency of discussions (80.2% discussed fears, 71.0% discussed prognosis, 54.2% discussed treatment preferences at least once); however, only 44.3% of patients reported discussing what is important to them in considering health care preferences. Patients reported having ACP conversations most often with their oncologists (84.7%) and cancer clinic nurses (61.8%). Patients reported a high level of satisfaction with their ACP conversations, with over 80% of patients reported feeling heard and understood. From enrollment to month 3, there was an increase in the number of patients with a GCD order from 53% to 74%. (4) Conclusions: Patients reported more frequent conversations compared to the literature and clinical documentation. While the satisfaction with these conversations is high, there is room for quality improvement, particularly in eliciting patients' personal goals for their treatment.
oncology