Abstract:Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods have been widely applied in drug discovery, lead optimization, toxicity prediction, and regulatory decisions. Despite major advances in algorithms and software, QSAR models have inherent limitations associated with a size and chemical-structure diversity of the training set, experimental error, and many characteristics of structure representation and correlation algorithms. Whereas excellent fit to the training data may be readily attainable, often models fail to predict accurately chemicals that are outside their domain of applicability. A QSAR's utility and, in the case of regulatory decisions, justification for usage increasingly depend on the ability to quantify a model's potential for predicting unknown chemicals with some known degree of certainty. It is never possible to predict an unknown chemical with absolute certainty. Here we report on two QSAR models based on different data sets for classification of chemicals according to their ability to bind to the estrogen receptor. The models were developed by using a novel QSAR method, Decision Forest, which combines the results of multiple heterogeneous but comparable Decision Tree models to produce a consensus prediction. We used an extensive cross-validation process to define an applicability domain for model predictions based on two quantitative measures: prediction confidence and domain extrapolation. Together, these measures quantify the accuracy of each prediction within and outside of the training domain. Despite being based on large and diverse training sets, both QSAR models had poor accuracy for chemicals within the domain of low confidence, whereas good accuracy was obtained for those within the domain of high confidence. For prediction in the high confidence domain, accuracy was inversely proportional to the degree of domain extrapolation. The model with a larger training set of 1,092, compared with 232 for the other, was more accurate in predicting chemicals at larger domain extrapolation, and could be particularly useful for rapidly prioritizing potential endocrine disruptors from large chemical universe.

Decision Forest: Combining the Predictions of Multiple Independent Decision Tree Models

Using Decision Forest to Classify Prostate Cancer Samples on the Basis of Seldi-Tof Ms Data: Assessing Chance Correlation and Prediction Confidence

Multiclass Decision Forest - A Novel Pattern Recognition Method For Multiclass Classification In Microarray Data Analysis

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

An Algorithmic Framework for Constructing Multiple Decision Trees by Evaluating Their Combination Performance Throughout the Construction Process

Application of a Decision Tree Model for Predicting Diabetic Retinopathy

Decision fusion systems for fault detection and identification in industrial processes

A Novel Approach of Multiple Submodel Integration Based on Decision Forest Construction

Induction of a Novel Hybrid Decision Forest Model Based on Information Theory.

MTForest: Ensemble Decision Trees based on Multi-Task Learning

The random subspace method for constructing decision forests

Implementation of a Scalable Decision Forest Model Based on Information Theory

Improved Weighted Random Forest for Classification Problems

A Development of Fuzzy Rule-based Regression Models through Using Decision Trees

Decision Combination Based on the Characterisation of Predictive Accuracy.

Decision Forest for Classification of Gene Expression Data

Assessment of Prediction Confidence and Domain Extrapolation of Two Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Predicting Estrogen Receptor Binding Activity

Dive into Decision Trees and Forests: A Theoretical Demonstration

Developing and Validating Predictive Decision Tree Models from Mining Chemical Structural Fingerprints and High–throughput Screening Data in PubChem

Decision trees combination method based on genetic algorithm with application in CRM

Combination Classification Method for Customer Relationship Management