Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures
Kuo Hao,Yingzhen Niu,Ao Feng,Fei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.041
2022-12-29
Abstract:Background It is unclear whether coronal stability differs between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare coronal laxity, radiological, and clinical outcomes between CR- and PS-TKAs. Methods Seventy-five CR-TKAs and Seventy-two PS-TKAs with a minimum two-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Coronal laxity was assessed at knee extension and 80° of flexion on varus and valgus stress radiographs. Radiological evaluation included femoral-tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, as well as positions of femoral and tibial components. Clinical evaluation included modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index, and range of motion (ROM). Results PS-TKA resulted in significantly larger varus, valgus, and total laxities at 80° flexion ( P = 0.034, 0.031, and 0.001, respectively) compared with CR-TKA, while no significant difference was found at extension ( P = 0.513, 0.964, and 0.658, respectively). No statistical difference was found in radiological and clinical outcomes between CR- and PS-TKAs, but the functional scores were slightly better in CR-TKA. There were adverse correlations between varus laxity at flexion and the WOMAC index, modified HSS score, and ROM (r = 0.933, -0.229, -0.472, respectively). Conclusion Coronal laxity at 80° of flexion was larger after PS-TKA than CR-TKA. In addition, clinical outcomes were adversely affected by the larger varus laxity at flexion. Care should be taken to maintain the coronal stability, especially at flexion, during surgery to obtain better patient-reported outcomes.
orthopedics