Attention, Recall, and Perceived Effectiveness Among Young Adult Users and Non-Users
Elizabeth G. Klein,Anne E. Driscoll,Abigail B. Shoben,Joseph M. Macisco,Stephanie Pike Moore,Amanda J. Quisenberry,Erika S. Trapl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21111442
IF: 4.614
2024-10-31
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Abstract:Limited research has examined attention to these cigar-specific health warnings and their perceived effectiveness among young people. The objective of our study was to evaluate the attention to and perceptions of a set of cigar-specific health warnings among young adult tobacco users and non-users. Methods: Young adults ages 18–24 in Columbus, Ohio, were recruited into an eye-tracking experiment examining cigarillo packaging between May 2022 and February 2023. Participants (n = 124) were shown 12 unique, branded cigarillo packages featuring a rotation of four of the Food and Drug Administration's mandated health warnings: (1) Cigar smoking can cause lung cancer and heart disease ("disease"); (2) tobacco smoke increases the risk of lung cancer and heart disease, even in nonsmokers ("nonsmokers"); (3) cigar smoking can cause cancers of the mouth and throat, even if you do not inhale ("inhale"); and (4) cigars are not a safe alternative to cigarettes ("alternative"). Software captured visual attention to each product package, including the health warning. Participants also ranked the most effective message to motivate people to quit; one week later, the participants (n = 118) self-reported unaided recall of the experiment. Results: Study participants were an average of 21.2 years old, 54.2% were female, 73.7% were White, 65.3% had some college education, and 26.3% reported tobacco use in the previous month. The health warning, "Cigar smoking can cause cancers of the mouth and throat, even if you do not inhale" was ranked the most effective cigar warning (41.5%) and drew the greatest proportion of visual attention (26.1%). More than half (52.5%) recalled details regarding the health warning messages one week following the experiment, with few recalling (17.7%) specific warning message themes. Conclusions: Understanding the best performing health warnings is a crucial strategy to share accurate information on the risks of tobacco use. Our findings suggest that the warning on cancer risk even without inhaling drew the greatest visual attention and highest rating of perceived effectiveness among this sample of young adult cigarillo users and non-users.
public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences