CURRENT STATUS OF PLAGUE AND PLAGUE CONTROL IN THE UNITED STATES

J. D. Poland,A. M. Barnes

Abstract:During the first quarter of the 20th century massive rat-borne plague epidemics occurred in port cities of the United States in conjunction with the last world-wide pandemic which originated in China in 1893. By 1950, plague was found to be firmly established in wild rodent populations in states west of the 100th meridian. Presumably because of improved sanitation coupled with retreat of the world-wide pandemic there have been no human cases in this country associated with urban rats since 1924. However, sporadic cases, fewer than 10 per year, are reported as due to contact with wild rodents, lagomorphs, rural rats, and/or their fleas. Recent observations suggest that: a) in the current decade there has been an increase in human plague cases; b) there continues to be a serious potential of a single undiagnosed and untreated case, which possibility is intensified by the very paucity of human cases decreasing the likelihood of a correct diagnosis and by changing patterns of life exhibited by members of our society (e.g., hippie communes and a generally increased mobility); and c) the apparent distribution of plague only in the area west of the 100th meridian might be found to represent an unrealistic generalization if adequate surveillance were carried out. At the present time human plague cases from wild animal sources tend to be isolated events both spatially and temporally and often cannot be attributed to confined and definable epizootic sources amenable to effective control programs. Improved means for epizootic control and long term management of enzootic plague sources must be sought aggressively. These measures should include development of: a) a surveillance network to detect plague activity in rodent and lagomorph populations throughout the western United States; b) effective, yet ecologically sound, means of ectoparasite control, including suitable materials and methods of application; c) methods for management of plague-susceptible wild animal populations, particularly where they exist in contact with high use recreation and residential areas; and d) more extensive knowledge of enzootic plague and the factors that bring about epizootic plague and potential human contact. Introduction: Plague was not described or recognized as a natural infection of man or rodents in the continental United States prior to the 20th century. Whether or not Yersinia (Pasteurella) pestis was introduced as an extension of the latest pandemic originating in Asia about 1893, the organism is presently f i r m l y entrenched in the w i l d rodent population of western North America from Kansas to the Pacific coast and the Mexican border to Canada. Y. pestis has never been found in Alaska and has not been isolated in the State of Hawaii since 1957. The plague b a c i l l u s is frequently detected close to major urban centers and undoubtedly occurs in such areas considerably more often than is documented. There are no conceivable means of eradicating rural plague or of e l i m i n a t i n g the hazard of its being introduced into an urban setting if urban populations of susceptible mammals are allowed to develop. There also continues to be a p o s s i b i l i t y that plague infected rats may reach our cities v i a cargo from other endemic areas such as southeast Asia. This hazard should now be n e g l i g i b l e as far as cargo from South Viet Nam is concerned if the pretreatment program instituted in 1969 is strictly adhered to. Urban Plague: Since 1924, no cases have resulted from exposure to urban rats and only one case was exposed in an urban setting. In the past decade there have been several isolated observations, however, which indicates the hazard of urban murine plague persists. From 1942 to 1944 rat epizootics occurred in Tacoma, Washington but no human cases resulted possibly due to the fact that the oriental rat flea (Xenopsylla cheopis) was not present. In 1963, a single Alexandrine rat, found dead in the marina d i s t r i c t of San Francisco, was infected w i t h plague. In 1964 the transfer of plague infection from a meadow vole population to neighboring Norway rats was detected near a study s i t e area outside San Francisco, California (Kartman, 1966). In 1967 a rat, taken from a s h i p returning from southeast Asia was fluorescent antibody positive for Y_. pestis. In 1968 a human bubonic plague case in Denver, Colorado tipped investigators to an extensive plague epizootic among urban fox squirrels (Sciurus niger). If a successful rat control program had not been in existence in Denver