Memory Binding Test Distinguishes Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia from Cognitively Normal Elderly.

H. Buschke,W. Mowrey,Wendy S. Ramratan,M. Zimmerman,D. Loewenstein,M. Katz,R. Lipton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx046
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Abstract:In this report, which assessed reliability and cross-sectional discriminative validity of the Memory Binding Test (MBT) to distinguish individuals with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia from cognitive normal elderly, an error was made in the characterization of the number of Pairs-In-the-Paired (PIP) condition. The incorrect PIP measure included in the publication was the number of pairs scored based on single items cued recalled from List 1 and List 2 under the single list recall condition, not the number of pairs recalled under the paired condition. Reanalysis was performed and main results are summarized here and in the tables below. In the publication, it was recommended that the Total number of Items under the Paired condition (TIP) of the MBT be used as the optimal index. Data on the TIP reported in the publication are correct. Reanalysis of the data using the correct values for PIP shows that PIP and TIP were highly correlated (Pearson’s correlation: 0.96). PIP has very good reliability (see revised Table 2 below) and cross-sectional discriminative validity (see revised Fig. 1 and revised Table 4 below) (corrections are noted in red font in the tables). PIP performed almost the same as TIP, but TIP is slightly more reliable. Partial AUC comparisons also showed that TIP had slightly better discriminative validity than PIP in distinguishing dementia from controls and aMCI, compared to single list recall measures, Cued Recall from list 1 (CR-L1) and Cued Recall from list 2 (CR-L2). TIP remains a better measure than PIP probably because that PIP counts only pairs but discards single items correctly recalled under the paired condition and that TIP also has a wider and finer range (0−32) compared to PIP (0−16). The good
What problem does this paper attempt to address?