Abstract:Reward-motivated memory has been studied extensively in psychology and neuroscience. Most studies follow the same type of paradigm: stimuli are cued at encoding with high or low reward values which indicate the amount the stimulus is worth if successfully remembered on a subsequent memory test, usually recognition. Each incorrect endorsement of a lure at retrieval is penalized with an arbitrary value between the high and low reward value, resulting in a single false alarm rate. Studies employing this type of paradigm have reported higher hit rates for high value items compared to low value items, but generally hit rate is the only measure of memory that is reported as a function of reward value. This leaves open the possibility that high reward items have a higher hit rate because participants are more willing to endorse those items as “old”, due to biases in the reward structure of these paradigms. Other measures, like discriminability and response bias, are overlooked when there is only a single false alarm rate, but we hypothesize that these other measures are also susceptible to motivational manipulations. To test whether reward motivation influences these other factors, we created a novel paradigm that associated rewards with categories (indoor vs. outdoor scenes), allowing for a separate false alarm rate as well as hit rate at each level of reward. We report results of three experiments that varied when reward cues were introduced and the penalties associated with false alarms for the categorized items. We replicated prior findings of higher hit rates for high compared to low reward items, but consistently across three experiments, when d’ was calculated, we found no difference in memory discriminability as a function of reward. Further, in two experiments we found that response bias was more conservative for low reward items: participants were more likely to endorse a “new” response to low compared to high reward items. This latter effect of reward on response bias did not occur when the amount of the false alarm penalty matched the possible reward. Our findings reveal that reward motivation influences memory, but also decisional biases thought to be independent of memory processes. The amount of both the reward value of the target items, and the amount of the false alarm penalty should be considered when designing experimental paradigms to study motivation-cognition interactions.

Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters

Do We Prioritise Memory for Cheaters? Rebuttal Evidence from Old/new Effects in Episodic Memory

The implicit cognition of reciprocal exchange: automatic retrieval of positive and negative experiences with partners in a prisoner's dilemma game

"I" Always Cooperate: Self-Positivity Bias in Destination Memory for Cooperation and Cheating

Memory as a cognitive requirement for reciprocal cooperation

Perception of Cheaters: The Role of Past and Present Academic Achievement

Preferential Learning and Memory Resolve Social Dilemma

Event-related potentials in response to cheating and cooperation in a social dilemma game

A human working memory advantage for social network information

Could Source Amnesia Occur in the Context of Working Memory

Self-Serving Bias in Memories.

Differential neural processing of reward and self-relevance in a social gambling paradigm

Individual differences in (dis)honesty are represented in the brain's functional connectivity at rest

Selective Memory and Motivated Delusion: Theory and Experiment

Dynamic valuation bias explains social influence on cheating behavior

Is There a Self-Positivity Bias for Destination Memory? Behavioral and ERP Evidence

Source memory and social exchange in young children

Reward Motivation Influences Response Bias on a Recognition Memory Task

Motivation and prediction-driven processing of social memoranda

Evolution of reciprocity with limited payoff memory

Age differences in cue utilization during prospective and retrospective memory monitoring.