Abstract:Introduction The need is great for safe and effective thera-peutic options for wound coverage and tissue repair in diverse clinical settings, such as in acute skin wounds, burns and chronic skin ul-cers, which represent a major burden on world health care costs. Autografting with split-thickness skin is the preferred treatment for coverage of excised burn wounds, but donor sites for autografting are limited in patients with very large burns. In these patients, wound cov-erage requires repeated harvesting of available donor sites, which is associated with pain and scarring at the donor site and lengthy hospital stays. Moreover, in the developed world, life expectancy and affluence have increased so markedly that chronic wound associated with aging and diabetes has become significant. The traditional treatment of relatively small chronic wounds has included the use of topical agents and grafting of split- or full-thickness skin. Skin grafts can provide timely wound coverage but may lead to painful donor sites, which are slow to heal and may be unsuccessful because of underlying deficiencies in wound healing [1]. As well, although congenital skin conditions and diseases affect a relatively small fraction of the population, they represent significant chal-lenges for wound coverage [2]. Because of the limited use of autografts and allografts and the large medical need for wound coverage in these diverse patient populations，bioengineered skin has been developed to pro-vide new alternatives for clinicians to restore various skin defects. Over the last 30 years, bioengineered skin research, as one of the most active fields in biological substitutes, has ex-tended the prospects for improving outcomes for patients with acute and chronic skin wounds. The first-documented bioengineered skin product, cultured epithelial autografts, ap-peared 30 years ago. Rheinwald and Green iso-lated and cultured keratinocytes from skin, which was further developed into small sheets of cells, two or three cell-layers thick [3]. Evi-dence suggests that cultured skin cells returned to a patient retain the capacity to self-renew for a lifetime [4]. However, delivering keratinocytes as small sheets is problematic. The sheets are fragile, and many of the keratinocytes are al-ready differentiated beyond the point to which they can take any active part in providing a new epithelium. Hence, the company Genzyme fur-ther created living epithelial sheets with this Int J Burn Trauma 2011;1(1):1-10 www.IJBT.org /ISSN: 2160-2026/IJBT1106001

[Skin engineering for severe burns]

[Present and future of cell therapy in burns]

[Use of Heterogeneous Acelluar Dermal Matrix and Autologous Overthin Split-Thickness Skin for Repair of Deep Burn at Articular Sites].

Successful Application of Tissue Engineering Skin to Third Degree Burn Wound on Lateral Thorax: A Case Study

The added value of cultured cells in burn treatment: a systematic review.

[Tissue Engineered Skin and Regenerative Wound Repair].

Repair of Deep Burn Skin Defects with Cultured Epidermal Stem Cells and Acellular Amniotic Membranes

Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin

Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury

Cultured Skin in the Modern Era and the Impact of Infrastructure Volatility on Learning Curves: A 33-Year Institutional Review

Review Article Tissue-engineered skin: bottleneck or breakthrough

[Augmentation of Quality of Wound Healing of Deep Burn].

Skin wound repair: Results of a pre-clinical study to evaluate electropsun collagen-elastin-PCL scaffolds as dermal substitutes

The Progress and Challenges for Dermal Regeneration in Tissue Engineering.

[Management of a Patient with Massive and Deep Burns: Early Care and Reconstruction after Convalescence].

Validation of an implantable bioink using mechanical extraction of human skin cells: First steps to a 3D bioprinting treatment of deep second degree burn

Stem cells derived from burned skin - The future of burn care

Tissue-Engineered Skin: Bottleneck Or Breakthrough

Skin regeneration, repair, and reconstruction: present and future

A systematic review: Current trends and take rates of cultured epithelial autografts in the treatment of patients with burn injuries

Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for the Treatment of Burn Wounds: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies